linux-kernel - Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v7 05/15] mm/bootmem_info: Introduce {free,prepare}_vmemmap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 9 Dec 2020 17:43:56 +0800
From:   Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
To:     David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, mingo@...hat.com,
        bp@...en8.de, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
        dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, luto@...nel.org,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, paulmck@...nel.org,
        mchehab+huawei@...nel.org, pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, oneukum@...e.com,
        anshuman.khandual@....com, jroedel@...e.de,
        Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        "Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)" <song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com>,
        Xiongchun duan <duanxiongchun@...edance.com>,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v7 05/15] mm/bootmem_info: Introduce {free,prepare}_vmemmap_page()

On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 5:33 PM David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On 09.12.20 10:25, Muchun Song wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 4:50 PM David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 09.12.20 08:36, Muchun Song wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 8:39 PM David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On 30.11.20 16:18, Muchun Song wrote:
> >>>>> In the later patch, we can use the free_vmemmap_page() to free the
> >>>>> unused vmemmap pages and initialize a page for vmemmap page using
> >>>>> via prepare_vmemmap_page().
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>>  include/linux/bootmem_info.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>>>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/bootmem_info.h b/include/linux/bootmem_info.h
> >>>>> index 4ed6dee1adc9..239e3cc8f86c 100644
> >>>>> --- a/include/linux/bootmem_info.h
> >>>>> +++ b/include/linux/bootmem_info.h
> >>>>> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
> >>>>>  #define __LINUX_BOOTMEM_INFO_H
> >>>>>
> >>>>>  #include <linux/mmzone.h>
> >>>>> +#include <linux/mm.h>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>  /*
> >>>>>   * Types for free bootmem stored in page->lru.next. These have to be in
> >>>>> @@ -22,6 +23,29 @@ void __init register_page_bootmem_info_node(struct pglist_data *pgdat);
> >>>>>  void get_page_bootmem(unsigned long info, struct page *page,
> >>>>>                     unsigned long type);
> >>>>>  void put_page_bootmem(struct page *page);
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +static inline void free_vmemmap_page(struct page *page)
> >>>>> +{
> >>>>> +     VM_WARN_ON(!PageReserved(page) || page_ref_count(page) != 2);
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +     /* bootmem page has reserved flag in the reserve_bootmem_region */
> >>>>> +     if (PageReserved(page)) {
> >>>>> +             unsigned long magic = (unsigned long)page->freelist;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +             if (magic == SECTION_INFO || magic == MIX_SECTION_INFO)
> >>>>> +                     put_page_bootmem(page);
> >>>>> +             else
> >>>>> +                     WARN_ON(1);
> >>>>> +     }
> >>>>> +}
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +static inline void prepare_vmemmap_page(struct page *page)
> >>>>> +{
> >>>>> +     unsigned long section_nr = pfn_to_section_nr(page_to_pfn(page));
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +     get_page_bootmem(section_nr, page, SECTION_INFO);
> >>>>> +     mark_page_reserved(page);
> >>>>> +}
> >>>>
> >>>> Can you clarify in the description when exactly these functions are
> >>>> called and on which type of pages?
> >>>>
> >>>> Would indicating "bootmem" in the function names make it clearer what we
> >>>> are dealing with?
> >>>>
> >>>> E.g., any memory allocated via the memblock allocator and not via the
> >>>> buddy will be makred reserved already in the memmap. It's unclear to me
> >>>> why we need the mark_page_reserved() here - can you enlighten me? :)
> >>>
> >>> Sorry for ignoring this question. Because the vmemmap pages are allocated
> >>> from the bootmem allocator which is marked as PG_reserved. For those bootmem
> >>> pages, we should call put_page_bootmem for free. You can see that we
> >>> clear the PG_reserved in the put_page_bootmem. In order to be consistent,
> >>> the prepare_vmemmap_page also marks the page as PG_reserved.
> >>
> >> I don't think that really makes sense.
> >>
> >> After put_page_bootmem() put the last reference, it clears PG_reserved
> >> and hands the page over to the buddy via free_reserved_page(). From that
> >> point on, further get_page_bootmem() would be completely wrong and
> >> dangerous.
> >>
> >> Both, put_page_bootmem() and get_page_bootmem() rely on the fact that
> >> they are dealing with memblock allcoations - marked via PG_reserved. If
> >> prepare_vmemmap_page() would be called on something that's *not* coming
> >> from the memblock allocator, it would be completely broken - or am I
> >> missing something?
> >>
> >> AFAIKT, there should rather be a BUG_ON(!PageReserved(page)) in
> >> prepare_vmemmap_page() - or proper handling to deal with !memblock
> >> allocations.
> >>
> >
> > I want to allocate some pages as the vmemmap when
> > we free a HugeTLB page to the buddy allocator. So I use
> > the prepare_vmemmap_page() to initialize the page (which
> > allocated from buddy allocator) and make it as the vmemmap
> > of the freed HugeTLB page.
> >
> > Any suggestions to deal with this case?
>
> If you obtained pages via the buddy, there shouldn't be anything special
> to handle, no? What speaks against
>
>
> prepare_vmemmap_page():
> if (!PageReserved(page))
>         return;
>
>
> put_page_bootmem():
> if (!PageReserved(page))
>         __free_page();
>

Thanks.

>
> Or if we care about multiple references, get_page() and put_page().
>
> >
> > I have a solution to address this. When the pages allocated
> > from the buddy as vmemmap pages,  we do not call
> > prepare_vmemmap_page().
> >
> > When we free some vmemmap pages of a HugeTLB
> > page, if the PG_reserved of the vmemmap page is set,
> > we call free_vmemmap_page() to free it to buddy,
> > otherwise call free_page(). What is your opinion?
>
> That would also work. Then, please include "bootmem" as part of the
> function name. If you plan on using my suggestion, you can drop
> "bootmem" from the name as it works for both types of pages.
>

Agree. Thanks.

>
> --
> Thanks,
>
> David / dhildenb
>


-- 
Yours,
Muchun