lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <3bed61807fff6268789e7d411412fbc5cd6ffe2a.1607507863.git.hns@goldelico.com>
Date:   Wed,  9 Dec 2020 10:57:44 +0100
From:   "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@...delico.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        linus.walleij@...aro.org
Cc:     linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        letux-kernel@...nphoenux.org, kernel@...a-handheld.com,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>, thesven73@...il.com,
        lukas@...ner.de, laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com,
        andreas@...nade.info, "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@...delico.com>
Subject: [PATCH] spi: dt-bindings: clarify CS behavior for spi-cs-high and gpio descriptors

Behavior of CS signal in combination of spi-cs-high and gpio descriptors
is not clearly defined and documented. So clarify the documentation

Cc: linus.walleij@...aro.org
Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@...delico.com>
---
 .../bindings/spi/spi-controller.yaml          | 27 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-controller.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-controller.yaml
index 1b56d5e40f1fc..5f505810104dd 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-controller.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-controller.yaml
@@ -42,6 +42,33 @@ properties:
         cs2 : &gpio1 1 0
         cs3 : &gpio1 2 0
 
+      The second flag of a gpio descriptor can be GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH (0)
+      or GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW(1). Legacy device trees often use 0.
+
+      There is a special rule set for combining the second flag of an
+      cs-gpio with the optional spi-cs-high flag for SPI slaves.
+
+      Each table entry defines how the CS pin is to be physically
+      driven (not considering potential gpio inversions by pinmux):
+
+      device node     | cs-gpio       | CS pin state active | Note
+      ================+===============+=====================+=====
+      spi-cs-high     | -             | H                   |
+      -               | -             | L                   |
+      spi-cs-high     | ACTIVE_HIGH   | H                   |
+      -               | ACTIVE_HIGH   | L                   | 1
+      spi-cs-high     | ACTIVE_LOW    | H                   | 2
+      -               | ACTIVE_LOW    | L                   |
+
+      Notes:
+      1) Should print a warning about polarity inversion.
+         Here it would be wise to avoid and define the gpio as
+         ACTIVE_LOW.
+      2) Should print a warning about polarity inversion
+         because ACTIVE_LOW is overridden by spi-cs-high.
+         Should be generally avoided and be replaced by
+         spi-cs-high + ACTIVE_HIGH.
+
   num-cs:
     $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
     description:
-- 
2.26.2

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ