linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: ingenic: Only support SoCs enabled in config

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFr9PX=EgQSXeATLn++DSHkkQar35rpLGh978J5Lnw9jS8XMrw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 9 Dec 2020 19:13:55 +0900
From:   Daniel Palmer <daniel@...f.com>
To:     Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>, od@...c.me,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: ingenic: Only support SoCs enabled in config

Hi Paul and others,

Sorry to hijack this but I actually want to do something similar to
this in some other drivers.
The targets I'm working with have only 64MB of ram so I want to remove
code wherever possible.
Is there any reason to do it like this instead of wrapping the whole
unneeded of_device_id struct in an #ifdef?
For example there is a rule that the compatible strings have to be
present even if the driver isn't usable or something?

Thanks,

Daniel