[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <X9CxsWOCoWPS8KZf@alley>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 12:14:57 +0100
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH next v4 0/2] printk: remove logbuf_lock writer-protection
of ringbuffer
On Wed 2020-12-09 01:50:51, John Ogness wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Here is a v4 of the series to partially remove logbuf_lock.
> v3 is here[0]. This series removes logbuf_lock usage of most
> ringbuffer writers. The remaining logbuf_lock users are
> using the lock to synchronize other variables. These other
> users will be addressed in a later series.
>
> I have tried to keep these changes minimal so that we can feel
> comfortable for the upcoming 5.11 merge window.
Both patches are pushed in printk/linux.git, branch printk-rework.
I hurried so that we could get some testing linux-next before
the merge window opens.
We are going to see if the many barriers in the ring buffer
code are enough ;-) I keep my fingers crossed.
Best Regards,
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists