[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201209130130.GA15469@nautica>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 14:01:30 +0100
From: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the kbuild tree
Stephen Rothwell wrote on Wed, Dec 09, 2020:
> After merging the kbuild tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> modules_install) produced this warning:
>
> Warning: 'make modules_install' requires depmod. Please install it.
> This is probably in the kmod package.
>
> Introduced by commit
>
> 330029209513 ("kbuild: don't hardcode depmod path")
>
> Unfortunately for most of us (?), /sbin is not in our PATH ...
d'oh.
Now you say this, I always found stupid distros that don't include sbin
in user PATHs: utilities like ip and a few others are perfectly useable
as reglar users to query the system state and the first thing I always
do is to add /sbin to my path on the rare distros that do this
(debian-based distros only?) so it totally slipped out of my head :/
I guess it's possible to make kbuild check both sbin and PATH, would
that be acceptable?
I'll have a look at how to do that if so.
--
Dominique
Powered by blists - more mailing lists