[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <X9DtxFgrkFIUIzyv@localhost>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 16:31:16 +0100
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
patong.mxl@...il.com,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
Angelo Dureghello <angelo.dureghello@...esys.com>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] usb: serial: xr_serial: Add gpiochip support
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 06:22:50PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 01:41:52PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 10:57 AM Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org> wrote:
> > I think if this driver already has unique line-names per-gpiochip
> > we could actually make it depend on !GPIO_SYSFS and
> > just add the names.
>
> Sure thing.
>
> Johan, if you are okay with this I can resubmit incorporating Linus's
> suggestion.
Let's wait a bit with adding the names.
That can possibly be done as a follow-up too even if removing GPIO_SYSFS
support later is not ideal in case that's the path chosen (we'd have a
similar problem with the existing USB-serial GPIO implementations though).
Johan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists