[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201209163945.GA570905@robh.at.kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 10:39:45 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Punit Agrawal <punit1.agrawal@...hiba.co.jp>
Cc: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@...hiba.co.jp>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, yuji2.ishikawa@...hiba.co.jp,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: gpio: Add bindings for Toshiba
Visconti GPIO Controller
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 05:16:51PM +0900, Punit Agrawal wrote:
> Iwamatsu-san,
>
> Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@...hiba.co.jp> writes:
>
> > Add bindings for the Toshiba Visconti GPIO Controller.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@...hiba.co.jp>
> > ---
> > .../bindings/gpio/toshiba,gpio-visconti.yaml | 85 +++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 85 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/toshiba,gpio-visconti.yaml
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/toshiba,gpio-visconti.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/toshiba,gpio-visconti.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..5168a15b90e1
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/toshiba,gpio-visconti.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > +%YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/gpio/toshiba,gpio-visconti.yaml#
> > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > +
> > +title: Toshiba Visconti ARM SoCs GPIO controller
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > + - Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@...hiba.co.jp>
> > +
> > +properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + items:
> > + - const: toshiba,gpio-tmpv7708
> > +
> > + reg:
> > + maxItems: 1
> > +
> > + "#gpio-cells":
> > + const: 2
> > +
> > + gpio-ranges: true
>
> I am not sure I have a good handle on the yaml schema definitions but
> "gpio-ranges" feels like it should be a list of ranges not a boolean.
>
> Something like -
>
> gpio-ranges:
> maxItems: 1
>
> feels more appropriate.
>
> I see both the usages in gpio bindings and for other range properties so
> maybe it's OK. I hope Rob or somebody more knowledgeable on this can
> clarify the usage.
If you know how many (or a range) entries there are for gpio-ranges,
then maxItems is good. If you don't, then 'gpio-ranges: true' is fine.
That doesn't make the property a boolean, but just says the property can
be present.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists