linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 01/12] mm: memcontrol: fix NR_ANON

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201210160214.GG264602@cmpxchg.org>
Date:   Thu, 10 Dec 2020 17:02:14 +0100
From:   Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To:     Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
Cc:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, rafael@...nel.org, adobriyan@...il.com,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mhocko@...nel.org,
        vdavydov.dev@...il.com, hughd@...gle.com, will@...nel.org,
        guro@...com, rppt@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, esyr@...hat.com,
        peterx@...hat.com, krisman@...labora.com, surenb@...gle.com,
        avagin@...nvz.org, elver@...gle.com, rdunlap@...radead.org,
        iamjoonsoo.kim@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 01/12] mm: memcontrol: fix NR_ANON_THPS account

On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 05:00:47PM +0100, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 06, 2020 at 06:14:40PM +0800, Muchun Song wrote:
> > The unit of NR_ANON_THPS is HPAGE_PMD_NR already. So it should inc/dec
> > by one rather than nr_pages.
> 
> This is a real bug, thanks for catching it.
> 
> However, your patch changes the user-visible output of /proc/vmstat!
> 
> NR_ANON_THPS isn't just used by memcg, it's a generic accounting item
> of the memory subsystem. See this from the Fixes:-patch:
> 
> -                       __inc_node_page_state(page, NR_ANON_THPS);
> +                       __inc_lruvec_page_state(page, NR_ANON_THPS);
> 
> While we've considered /proc/vmstat less official than other files
> like meminfo, and have in the past freely added and removed items,
> changing the unit of an existing one is not going to work.

Argh, I hit send instead of cancel after noticing that I misread your
patch completely. Scratch what I wrote above.