lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 10 Dec 2020 15:26:42 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, "J. Avila" <elavila@...gle.com>,
        Daniel Mentz <danielmentz@...gle.com>,
        Will McVicker <willmcvicker@...gle.com>,
        "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.9 17/75] ring-buffer: Update write stamp with the correct ts

From: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>

commit 55ea4cf403800af2ce6b125bc3d853117e0c0456 upstream.

The write stamp, used to calculate deltas between events, was updated with
the stale "ts" value in the "info" structure, and not with the updated "ts"
variable. This caused the deltas between events to be inaccurate, and when
crossing into a new sub buffer, had time go backwards.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201124223917.795844-1-elavila@google.com

Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Fixes: a389d86f7fd09 ("ring-buffer: Have nested events still record running time stamp")
Reported-by: "J. Avila" <elavila@...gle.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Mentz <danielmentz@...gle.com>
Tested-by: Will McVicker <willmcvicker@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
@@ -3291,7 +3291,7 @@ __rb_reserve_next(struct ring_buffer_per
 			/* Nothing came after this event between C and E */
 			info->delta = ts - info->after;
 			(void)rb_time_cmpxchg(&cpu_buffer->write_stamp,
-					      info->after, info->ts);
+					      info->after, ts);
 			info->ts = ts;
 		} else {
 			/*


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ