lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 10 Dec 2020 11:22:21 -0600
From:   Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To:     Rishabh Bhatnagar <rishabhb@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        tsoni@...eaurora.org, psodagud@...eaurora.org,
        sidgup@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] remoteproc: Add ftrace events to trace lifecycle
 of remoteprocs

On Mon 16 Nov 15:44 CST 2020, Rishabh Bhatnagar wrote:

> Add trace events to trace bootup/shutdown/recovery of remote
> processors. These events are useful in analyzing the time
> spent in each step in the life cycle and can be used for
> performace analysis. Also these serve as standard checkpoints
> in debugging.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rishabh Bhatnagar <rishabhb@...eaurora.org>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 19 +++++++-
>  include/trace/events/remoteproc.h    | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  create mode 100644 include/trace/events/remoteproc.h
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index dab2c0f..39da409 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -42,6 +42,9 @@
>  
>  #include "remoteproc_internal.h"
>  
> +#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> +#include <trace/events/remoteproc.h>
> +
>  #define HIGH_BITS_MASK 0xFFFFFFFF00000000ULL
>  
>  static DEFINE_MUTEX(rproc_list_mutex);
> @@ -1164,6 +1167,7 @@ static int rproc_prepare_subdevices(struct rproc *rproc)
>  	struct rproc_subdev *subdev;
>  	int ret;
>  
> +	trace_rproc_subdevices("Prepare subdevices", rproc->name);

Please use specific trace events, rather than these trace_printk() like
ones.

>  	list_for_each_entry(subdev, &rproc->subdevs, node) {
>  		if (subdev->prepare) {
>  			ret = subdev->prepare(subdev);
> @@ -1188,6 +1192,7 @@ static int rproc_start_subdevices(struct rproc *rproc)
>  	struct rproc_subdev *subdev;
>  	int ret;
>  
> +	trace_rproc_subdevices("Start subdevices", rproc->name);
>  	list_for_each_entry(subdev, &rproc->subdevs, node) {
>  		if (subdev->start) {
>  			ret = subdev->start(subdev);
> @@ -1211,6 +1216,7 @@ static void rproc_stop_subdevices(struct rproc *rproc, bool crashed)
>  {
>  	struct rproc_subdev *subdev;
>  
> +	trace_rproc_subdevices("Stop subdevices", rproc->name);
>  	list_for_each_entry_reverse(subdev, &rproc->subdevs, node) {
>  		if (subdev->stop)
>  			subdev->stop(subdev, crashed);
> @@ -1221,6 +1227,7 @@ static void rproc_unprepare_subdevices(struct rproc *rproc)
>  {
>  	struct rproc_subdev *subdev;
>  
> +	trace_rproc_subdevices("Unprepare subdevices", rproc->name);
>  	list_for_each_entry_reverse(subdev, &rproc->subdevs, node) {
>  		if (subdev->unprepare)
>  			subdev->unprepare(subdev);
> @@ -1357,6 +1364,7 @@ static int rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
>  	struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
>  	int ret;
>  
> +	trace_rproc_boot("loading firmware segments into memory", rproc->name);
>  	/* load the ELF segments to memory */
>  	ret = rproc_load_segments(rproc, fw);
>  	if (ret) {
> @@ -1385,6 +1393,7 @@ static int rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
>  		goto reset_table_ptr;
>  	}
>  
> +	trace_rproc_boot("starting remoteproc", rproc->name);
>  	/* power up the remote processor */
>  	ret = rproc->ops->start(rproc);
>  	if (ret) {
> @@ -1402,6 +1411,7 @@ static int rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
>  
>  	rproc->state = RPROC_RUNNING;
>  
> +	trace_rproc_boot("remoteproc is up", rproc->name);
>  	dev_info(dev, "remote processor %s is now up\n", rproc->name);
>  
>  	return 0;
> @@ -1648,6 +1658,7 @@ static int rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc, bool crashed)
>  	/* the installed resource table is no longer accessible */
>  	rproc->table_ptr = rproc->cached_table;
>  
> +	trace_rproc_shutdown("Stopping the remoteproc", rproc->name);
>  	/* power off the remote processor */
>  	ret = rproc->ops->stop(rproc);
>  	if (ret) {
> @@ -1697,6 +1708,7 @@ int rproc_trigger_recovery(struct rproc *rproc)
>  	if (rproc->state != RPROC_CRASHED)
>  		goto unlock_mutex;
>  
> +	trace_rproc_recovery("Recover remoteproc", rproc->name);
>  	dev_err(dev, "recovering %s\n", rproc->name);
>  
>  	ret = rproc_stop(rproc, true);
> @@ -1716,6 +1728,7 @@ int rproc_trigger_recovery(struct rproc *rproc)
>  	/* boot the remote processor up again */
>  	ret = rproc_start(rproc, firmware_p);
>  
> +	trace_rproc_recovery("Recovery completed", rproc->name);
>  	release_firmware(firmware_p);
>  
>  unlock_mutex:
> @@ -1796,6 +1809,7 @@ int rproc_boot(struct rproc *rproc)
>  	/* skip the boot or attach process if rproc is already powered up */
>  	if (atomic_inc_return(&rproc->power) > 1) {
>  		ret = 0;
> +		trace_rproc_boot("Incrementing ref count and exiting", rproc->name);

Why tracing only this case? If you really would like to know if this
ends up booting the core or not perhaps we could include the refcount in
the event?

>  		goto unlock_mutex;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -1804,6 +1818,7 @@ int rproc_boot(struct rproc *rproc)
>  
>  		ret = rproc_actuate(rproc);
>  	} else {
> +		trace_rproc_boot("requesting firmware", rproc->name);

I can see how this would be useful, but don't you want to know the
firmware name? And why not just include it in the trace_rproc_boot event?

>  		dev_info(dev, "powering up %s\n", rproc->name);
>  
>  		/* load firmware */
> @@ -1858,8 +1873,10 @@ void rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc)
>  	}
>  
>  	/* if the remote proc is still needed, bail out */
> -	if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&rproc->power))
> +	if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&rproc->power)) {
> +		trace_rproc_shutdown("Decrementing ref count and exiting", rproc->name);

As above, why not trace all calls to rproc_shutdown()?

>  		goto out;
> +	}
>  
>  	ret = rproc_stop(rproc, false);
>  	if (ret) {
> diff --git a/include/trace/events/remoteproc.h b/include/trace/events/remoteproc.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..341bf4b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/trace/events/remoteproc.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2020, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
> + */
> +
> +#undef TRACE_SYSTEM
> +#define TRACE_SYSTEM remoteproc
> +
> +#if !defined(_TRACE_REMOTEPROC_H) || defined(TRACE_HEADER_MULTI_READ)
> +#define _TRACE_REMOTEPROC_H
> +
> +#include <linux/tracepoint.h>
> +
> +TRACE_EVENT(rproc_boot,
> +
> +	TP_PROTO(const char *event, const char *rproc_name),
> +
> +	TP_ARGS(event, rproc_name),
> +
> +	TP_STRUCT__entry(
> +		__string(event, event)
> +		__string(rproc_name, rproc_name)
> +	),
> +
> +	TP_fast_assign(
> +		__assign_str(event, event);
> +		__assign_str(rproc_name, rproc_name);
> +	),
> +
> +	TP_printk("rproc_boot: %s: %s", __get_str(rproc_name), __get_str(event))

As with the other patch, please don't duplicate the event name in the
printk format.

Regards,
Bjorn

> +);
> +
> +TRACE_EVENT(rproc_shutdown,
> +
> +	TP_PROTO(const char *event, const char *rproc_name),
> +
> +	TP_ARGS(event, rproc_name),
> +
> +	TP_STRUCT__entry(
> +		__string(event, event)
> +		__string(rproc_name, rproc_name)
> +	),
> +
> +	TP_fast_assign(
> +		__assign_str(event, event);
> +		__assign_str(rproc_name, rproc_name);
> +	),
> +
> +	TP_printk("rproc_shutdown: %s: %s", __get_str(rproc_name), __get_str(event))
> +);
> +
> +TRACE_EVENT(rproc_recovery,
> +
> +	TP_PROTO(const char *event, const char *rproc_name),
> +
> +	TP_ARGS(event, rproc_name),
> +
> +	TP_STRUCT__entry(
> +		__string(event, event)
> +		__string(rproc_name, rproc_name)
> +	),
> +
> +	TP_fast_assign(
> +		__assign_str(event, event);
> +		__assign_str(rproc_name, rproc_name);
> +	),
> +
> +	TP_printk("rproc_recovery: %s: %s", __get_str(rproc_name), __get_str(event))
> +);
> +
> +TRACE_EVENT(rproc_subdevices,
> +
> +	TP_PROTO(const char *event, const char *rproc_name),
> +
> +	TP_ARGS(event, rproc_name),
> +
> +	TP_STRUCT__entry(
> +		__string(event, event)
> +		__string(rproc_name, rproc_name)
> +	),
> +
> +	TP_fast_assign(
> +		__assign_str(event, event);
> +		__assign_str(rproc_name, rproc_name);
> +	),
> +
> +	TP_printk("rproc_subdevices: %s: %s", __get_str(rproc_name), __get_str(event))
> +);
> +#endif
> +#include <trace/define_trace.h>
> +
> -- 
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ