lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20201210142603.461578564@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 10 Dec 2020 15:27:04 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 27/31] tracing: Fix userstacktrace option for instances

From: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>

commit bcee5278958802b40ee8b26679155a6d9231783e upstream.

When the instances were able to use their own options, the userstacktrace
option was left hardcoded for the top level. This made the instance
userstacktrace option bascially into a nop, and will confuse users that set
it, but nothing happens (I was confused when it happened to me!)

Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Fixes: 16270145ce6b ("tracing: Add trace options for core options to instances")
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 kernel/trace/trace.c |    7 ++++---
 kernel/trace/trace.h |    6 ++++--
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
@@ -2404,7 +2404,7 @@ void trace_buffer_unlock_commit_regs(str
 	 * two. They are that meaningful.
 	 */
 	ftrace_trace_stack(tr, buffer, flags, regs ? 0 : 4, pc, regs);
-	ftrace_trace_userstack(buffer, flags, pc);
+	ftrace_trace_userstack(tr, buffer, flags, pc);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -2734,14 +2734,15 @@ void trace_dump_stack(int skip)
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, user_stack_count);
 
 void
-ftrace_trace_userstack(struct ring_buffer *buffer, unsigned long flags, int pc)
+ftrace_trace_userstack(struct trace_array *tr,
+		       struct ring_buffer *buffer, unsigned long flags, int pc)
 {
 	struct trace_event_call *call = &event_user_stack;
 	struct ring_buffer_event *event;
 	struct userstack_entry *entry;
 	struct stack_trace trace;
 
-	if (!(global_trace.trace_flags & TRACE_ITER_USERSTACKTRACE))
+	if (!(tr->trace_flags & TRACE_ITER_USERSTACKTRACE))
 		return;
 
 	/*
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.h
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.h
@@ -739,13 +739,15 @@ void update_max_tr_single(struct trace_a
 #endif /* CONFIG_TRACER_MAX_TRACE */
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_STACKTRACE
-void ftrace_trace_userstack(struct ring_buffer *buffer, unsigned long flags,
+void ftrace_trace_userstack(struct trace_array *tr,
+			    struct ring_buffer *buffer, unsigned long flags,
 			    int pc);
 
 void __trace_stack(struct trace_array *tr, unsigned long flags, int skip,
 		   int pc);
 #else
-static inline void ftrace_trace_userstack(struct ring_buffer *buffer,
+static inline void ftrace_trace_userstack(struct trace_array *tr,
+					  struct ring_buffer *buffer,
 					  unsigned long flags, int pc)
 {
 }


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ