[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6d85013b195373211865bbf5eff9c5d973f74a57.camel@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 19:15:15 +0000
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, ashok.raj@...el.com, kevin.tian@...el.com,
dave.jiang@...el.com, megha.dey@...el.com,
alex.williamson@...hat.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
dan.j.williams@...el.com, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
eric.auger@...hat.com, jacob.jun.pan@...el.com, jgg@...lanox.com,
jing.lin@...el.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org, kwankhede@...dia.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
maz@...nel.org, mona.hossain@...el.com, netanelg@...lanox.com,
parav@...lanox.com, pbonzini@...hat.com, rafael@...nel.org,
samuel.ortiz@...el.com, sanjay.k.kumar@...el.com,
shahafs@...lanox.com, tony.luck@...el.com, vkoul@...nel.org,
yan.y.zhao@...ux.intel.com, yi.l.liu@...el.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] platform-msi: Add platform check for subdevice
irq domain
On Thu, 2020-12-10 at 12:57 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> What is the point of a function called probably_on_bare_metal()?
> *Probably*? The caller can't really do anything with the fact that
> we're not 100% sure this gives the correct answer. Just call it
> "on_bare_metal()" or something and accept the fact that it might be
> wrong sometimes.
Acknowledging that it's a heuristic is OK, but we should certainly be
clear about whether it has false positives, false negatives, or both.
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/x-pkcs7-signature" (5174 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists