[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <160763226856.1580929.7399412663078488395@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 12:31:08 -0800
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] dt-bindings: clock: Add SM8350 GCC clock bindings
Quoting Vinod Koul (2020-12-09 22:11:59)
> On 09-12-20, 22:01, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 12:17:00PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
>
> > > +required:
> > > + - compatible
> > > + - clocks
> > > + - clock-names
> > > + - reg
> > > + - '#clock-cells'
> > > + - '#reset-cells'
> >
> > You may or may not have power domains?
>
> I have not added them in the driver yet, so I dont think it made sense
> to add them when they are not present. For basic stuff it is not
> required but eventually yes, so I plan to update binding and driver at
> that time
>
They should still be required in the binding though if the hardware has
power domains. It's not like the hardware doesn't have power domains
already or can gain that ability after the fact. The driver should deal
with it when it is ready.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists