[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201210225405.GU3579531@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 22:54:05 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Jann Horn <jann@...jh.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] files: rcu free files_struct
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 11:30:24PM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
> (requiring btf), i.e. security_file_open, then follow
> file->f_inode->i_sb->s_type->s_magic. If we change the say struct
> super_block I'd expect these bpf programs to break.
To break they would need to have compiled in the first place;
->s_type is struct file_system_type and it contains no ->s_magic
(nor would it be possible, really - ->s_magic can vary between
filesystems that *do* share ->s_type).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists