[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20201210225640.317719-3-punitagrawal@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 07:56:40 +0900
From: Punit Agrawal <punitagrawal@...il.com>
To: rjw@...ysocki.net
Cc: Punit Agrawal <punitagrawal@...il.com>, wei.huang2@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
bp@...en8.de
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: acpi-cpufreq: Add processor to the ignore PSD override list
Booting Linux on a Zen2 based processor (family: 0x17, model: 0x60,
stepping: 0x1) shows the following message in the logs -
acpi_cpufreq: overriding BIOS provided _PSD data
Although commit 5368512abe08 ("acpi-cpufreq: Honor _PSD table setting
on new AMD CPUs") indicates that the override is not required for Zen3
onwards, it seems that domain information can be trusted even on
certain earlier systems. Update the check, to skip the override for
Zen2 processors known to work without the override.
Signed-off-by: Punit Agrawal <punitagrawal@...il.com>
Cc: Wei Huang <wei.huang2@....com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 9 +++++++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
index 126315ad225f..32b6449a438b 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
@@ -198,8 +198,13 @@ static bool amd_override_acpi_psd(unsigned int cpu_id)
if (c->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD) {
if (!check_amd_hwpstate_cpu(cpu_id))
return false;
-
- return c->x86 < 0x19;
+ /*
+ * CPU's before Zen3 (except some Zen2) need the
+ * override.
+ */
+ return (c->x86 < 0x19) &&
+ !(c->x86 == 0x17 && c->x86_model == 0x60 &&
+ c->x86_stepping == 0x1);
}
return false;
--
2.29.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists