[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <91b4b2f3591e6e8ce2d61daae31f2218d1a12b9e.camel@perches.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 14:20:12 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Nicolai Fischer <nicolai.fischer@....de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: apw@...onical.com, johannes.czekay@....de,
linux-kernel@...cs.fau.de
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] checkpatch: rewrite Kconfig parsing
On Wed, 2020-12-09 at 15:24 +0100, Nicolai Fischer wrote:
> We understand that checkpatch may not be the ideal place for all of these checks.
So please work on an ideal thing.
> However the current implementation has some problems we would like to fix.
> Would you be interested in a patch series addressing just the check for the number of lines?
> Specifically:
> 1)
> >
> > >
> > > I believe all the '---help---' lines have been converted to just 'help'
> > > so the '(?:---)?' bits here could be removed.
> >
> > Yes.
> >
> 2) add string, hex and int types to the $is_start regex
sure
> 3) improve the help message to include the number of present and expected lines
no. The concept of a required paragraph is still dubious.
> 4) Warn if help text is not followed by a blank line or endif
How often is it now not followed by a blank line or endif?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists