[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <80b7502b700df43df7f66fa79fb9893399d0abd1.camel@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2020 20:50:21 -0800
From: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
To: Huazhong Tan <tanhuazhong@...wei.com>, davem@...emloft.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kuba@...nel.org, huangdaode@...wei.com,
Jian Shen <shenjian15@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/7] net: hns3: add support for tc mqprio
offload
On Thu, 2020-12-10 at 11:42 +0800, Huazhong Tan wrote:
> From: Jian Shen <shenjian15@...wei.com>
>
> Currently, the HNS3 driver only supports offload for tc number
> and prio_tc. This patch adds support for other qopts, including
> queues count and offset for each tc.
>
> When enable tc mqprio offload, it's not allowed to change
> queue numbers by ethtool. For hardware limitation, the queue
> number of each tc should be power of 2.
>
> For the queues is not assigned to each tc by average, so it's
> should return vport->alloc_tqps for hclge_get_max_channels().
>
The commit message needs some improvements, it is not really clear what
the last two sentences are about.
> Signed-off-by: Jian Shen <shenjian15@...wei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Huazhong Tan <tanhuazhong@...wei.com>
> ---
>
...
>
> + if (kinfo->tc_info.mqprio_active) {
> + dev_err(&netdev->dev,
why not use netdev_err() and friends ?
anyway I see your driver is using dev_err(&netdev->dev, ...)
intensively,
maybe submit a follow up patch to fix all your prints ?
...]
>
> +static int hclge_mqprio_qopt_check(struct hclge_dev *hdev,
> + struct tc_mqprio_qopt_offload
> *mqprio_qopt)
> +{
> + u16 queue_sum = 0;
> + int ret;
> + int i;
> +
> + if (!mqprio_qopt->qopt.num_tc) {
> + mqprio_qopt->qopt.num_tc = 1;
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + ret = hclge_dcb_common_validate(hdev, mqprio_qopt->qopt.num_tc,
> + mqprio_qopt->qopt.prio_tc_map);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < mqprio_qopt->qopt.num_tc; i++) {
> + if (!is_power_of_2(mqprio_qopt->qopt.count[i])) {
> + dev_err(&hdev->pdev->dev,
> + "qopt queue count must be power of
> 2\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + if (mqprio_qopt->qopt.count[i] > hdev->rss_size_max) {
> + dev_err(&hdev->pdev->dev,
> + "qopt queue count should be no more
> than %u\n",
> + hdev->rss_size_max);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + if (mqprio_qopt->qopt.offset[i] != queue_sum) {
> + dev_err(&hdev->pdev->dev,
> + "qopt queue offset must start from 0,
> and being continuous\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + if (mqprio_qopt->min_rate[i] || mqprio_qopt-
> >max_rate[i]) {
> + dev_err(&hdev->pdev->dev,
> + "qopt tx_rate is not supported\n");
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + }
> +
> + queue_sum = mqprio_qopt->qopt.offset[i];
> + queue_sum += mqprio_qopt->qopt.count[i];
it will make more sense if you moved this queue summing outside of the
loop
> + }
> + if (hdev->vport[0].alloc_tqps < queue_sum) {
can't you just allocate new tqps according to the new mqprio input like
other drivers do ? how the user allocates those tqps ?
> + dev_err(&hdev->pdev->dev,
> + "qopt queue count sum should be less than
> %u\n",
> + hdev->vport[0].alloc_tqps);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void hclge_sync_mqprio_qopt(struct hnae3_tc_info *tc_info,
> + struct tc_mqprio_qopt_offload
> *mqprio_qopt)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + memset(tc_info, 0, sizeof(*tc_info));
> + tc_info->num_tc = mqprio_qopt->qopt.num_tc;
> + memcpy(tc_info->prio_tc, mqprio_qopt->qopt.prio_tc_map,
> + sizeof_field(struct hnae3_tc_info, prio_tc));
> + memcpy(tc_info->tqp_count, mqprio_qopt->qopt.count,
> + sizeof_field(struct hnae3_tc_info, tqp_count));
> + memcpy(tc_info->tqp_offset, mqprio_qopt->qopt.offset,
> + sizeof_field(struct hnae3_tc_info, tqp_offset));
> +
isn't it much easier to just store a copy of tc_mqprio_qopt in you
tc_info and then just:
tc_info->qopt = mqprio->qopt;
[...]
> - hclge_tm_schd_info_update(hdev, tc);
> - hclge_tm_prio_tc_info_update(hdev, prio_tc);
> -
> - ret = hclge_tm_init_hw(hdev, false);
> - if (ret)
> - goto err_out;
> + kinfo = &vport->nic.kinfo;
> + memcpy(&old_tc_info, &kinfo->tc_info, sizeof(old_tc_info));
if those are of the same kind, just normal assignment would be much
cleaner.
> + hclge_sync_mqprio_qopt(&kinfo->tc_info, mqprio_qopt);
> + kinfo->tc_info.mqprio_active = tc > 0;
>
> - ret = hclge_client_setup_tc(hdev);
> + ret = hclge_config_tc(hdev, &kinfo->tc_info);
> if (ret)
> goto err_out;
>
> @@ -436,6 +534,12 @@ static int hclge_setup_tc(struct hnae3_handle
> *h, u8 tc, u8 *prio_tc)
> return hclge_notify_init_up(hdev);
>
> err_out:
> + /* roll-back */
> + memcpy(&kinfo->tc_info, &old_tc_info, sizeof(old_tc_info));
same.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists