linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] platform-msi: Add platform check for subdevice irq domain

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <dad0bf6e271532badd84f2a811449be566f537a9.camel@infradead.org>
Date:   Thu, 10 Dec 2020 08:22:47 +0000
From:   David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To:     Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
        ashok.raj@...el.com, kevin.tian@...el.com, dave.jiang@...el.com,
        megha.dey@...el.com
Cc:     alex.williamson@...hat.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
        dan.j.williams@...el.com, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
        eric.auger@...hat.com, jacob.jun.pan@...el.com, jgg@...lanox.com,
        jing.lin@...el.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org, kwankhede@...dia.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        maz@...nel.org, mona.hossain@...el.com, netanelg@...lanox.com,
        parav@...lanox.com, pbonzini@...hat.com, rafael@...nel.org,
        samuel.ortiz@...el.com, sanjay.k.kumar@...el.com,
        shahafs@...lanox.com, tony.luck@...el.com, vkoul@...nel.org,
        yan.y.zhao@...ux.intel.com, yi.l.liu@...el.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] platform-msi: Add platform check for subdevice
 irq domain

On Thu, 2020-12-10 at 08:46 +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> +/*
> + * We want to figure out which context we are running in. But the hardware
> + * does not introduce a reliable way (instruction, CPUID leaf, MSR, whatever)
> + * which can be manipulated by the VMM to let the OS figure out where it runs.
> + * So we go with the below probably_on_bare_metal() function as a replacement
> + * for definitely_on_bare_metal() to go forward only for the very simple reason
> + * that this is the only option we have.
> + */
> +static const char * const possible_vmm_vendor_name[] = {
> +       "QEMU", "Bochs", "KVM", "Xen", "VMware", "VMW", "VMware Inc.",
> +       "innotek GmbH", "Oracle Corporation", "Parallels", "BHYVE",
> +       "Microsoft Corporation"
> +};

People do use SeaBIOS ("Bochs") on bare metal.

You'll also see "Amazon EC2" on virt instances as well as bare metal
instances. Although in that case I believe the virt instances do have
the 'virtual machine' flag set in bit 4 of the BIOS Characteristics
Extension Byte 2, and the bare metal obviously don't.



Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/x-pkcs7-signature" (5174 bytes)