[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201210083859.wqeuf3ijghbwtyuw@pengutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 09:38:59 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Thorsten Scherer <thorsten.scherer@...elmann.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] siox: two cleanups
On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 07:54:55PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 03:47:20PM +0100, Thorsten Scherer wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 10:31:04AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > compared to v2 sent starting with Message-Id:
> > > 20201124141834.3096325-1-u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de:
> > >
> > > - fix typo in commit log of patch 1
> > > - add Ack by Thorsten for patch 1
> > >
> > > Uwe Kleine-König (2):
> > > siox: Use bus_type functions for probe, remove and shutdown
> > > siox: Make remove callback return void
> >
> > Successfully ran our siox testcases on v3.
> >
> > Tested-by: Thorsten Scherer <t.scherer@...elmann.de>
>
> Are you going to take these patches, or do you need/want me to take them
> through one of my trees?
>
> Either is fine for me.
There is no repo for SIOX and up to know you were our upstream. So if
you could take them that would be great.
Given that I expect that the patch volume for SIOX continues to stay low
I see little benefit in establishing a different work flow.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists