[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f24787e727921e9e2bce5a2e7015eff1@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 08:49:57 +0800
From: Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>
To: Bean Huo <huobean@...il.com>
Cc: asutoshd@...eaurora.org, nguyenb@...eaurora.org,
hongwus@...eaurora.org, rnayak@...eaurora.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com,
saravanak@...gle.com, salyzyn@...gle.com,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] scsi: ufs: Clean up some lines from
ufshcd_hba_exit()
On 2020-12-10 06:17, Bean Huo wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-12-08 at 22:58 -0800, Can Guo wrote:
>> ufshcd_hba_exit() is always called after ufshcd_exit_clk_scaling()
>> and
>> ufshcd_exit_clk_gating(), so no need to suspend clock scaling again
>> in
>> ufshcd_hba_exit().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>
> Reviewed-by: Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>
Hi Bean,
Thanks for you review. But I sent V2 yesterday,
in which this patch is slightly updated.
Thanks,
Can Guo.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists