[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201210122202.GA8323@nautica>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 13:22:02 +0100
From: 'Dominique Martinet' <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>
To: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>
Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
"linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ld-version: use /usr/bin/env awk for shebank
Vincenzo Frascino wrote on Thu, Dec 10, 2020:
> On 12/9/20 10:03 PM, David Laight wrote:
>> Why bother with awk?
I wanted to keep the patch minimal, I'm not opposed to rewriting but
that always potentially has more impact (although as you say, this
script is simple enough)
> > I think you can do it all in a shell function.
> > Something like:
> > read line
> > line=${line##*)}
> > line=${line##*version }
> > IFS='.-'
> > set $line
> > echo $(($1*100000000 + $2*1000000 + $3*10000))
> >
> > That will work on any recent shell.
Works for me.
> I would suggest to revert the patch for now since we are close to the merge
> window and then maybe in -rc1 start discussing a better solution.
As far as I can see the patch is only in -next, as said earlier I'm in
favor of just dropping the patch until a decision is taken for the next
merge window (or the one after that); there's no hurry for me and
nothing to revert.
--
Dominique
Powered by blists - more mailing lists