[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201210130439.GA1883@pc638.lan>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 14:04:39 +0100
From: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, RCU <rcu@...r.kernel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Daniel Axtens <dja@...ens.net>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@...eaurora.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Theodore Y . Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@...ymobile.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] rcu-tasks: move RCU-tasks initialization out of
core_initcall()
On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 07:26:13PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 09:27:31PM +0100, Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) wrote:
> > Initialize the RCU-tasks earlier, before *_initcall() callbacks are
> > invoked. Do it after the workqueue subsytem is up and running. That
> > gives us a possibility to make use of synchronize_rcu_tasks*() wait
> > API in early_initcall() callbacks.
> >
> > Fixes: 36dadef23fcc ("kprobes: Init kprobes in early_initcall")
> > Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@...il.com>
>
> Thank you! I have queued both with the usual editing, so please
> check and let me know if I messed something up.
>
Thanks!
Will have a look at editing.
--
Vlad Rezki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists