[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bcba8a99-1e74-a042-2a3a-e07686c4c9ac@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 21:54:41 +0800
From: "xuxiaoyang (C)" <xuxiaoyang2@...wei.com>
To: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
Eric Farman <farman@...ux.ibm.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
<kwankhede@...dia.com>, <wu.wubin@...wei.com>,
<maoming.maoming@...wei.com>, <xieyingtai@...wei.com>,
<lizhengui@...wei.com>, <wubinfeng@...wei.com>,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] vfio iommu type1: Improve vfio_iommu_type1_pin_pages
performance
On 2020/12/9 19:54, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 21:55:53 +0800
> "xuxiaoyang (C)" <xuxiaoyang2@...wei.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2020/11/21 15:58, xuxiaoyang (C) wrote:
>>> vfio_pin_pages() accepts an array of unrelated iova pfns and processes
>>> each to return the physical pfn. When dealing with large arrays of
>>> contiguous iovas, vfio_iommu_type1_pin_pages is very inefficient because
>>> it is processed page by page.In this case, we can divide the iova pfn
>>> array into multiple continuous ranges and optimize them. For example,
>>> when the iova pfn array is {1,5,6,7,9}, it will be divided into three
>>> groups {1}, {5,6,7}, {9} for processing. When processing {5,6,7}, the
>>> number of calls to pin_user_pages_remote is reduced from 3 times to once.
>>> For single page or large array of discontinuous iovas, we still use
>>> vfio_pin_page_external to deal with it to reduce the performance loss
>>> caused by refactoring.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Xiaoyang Xu <xuxiaoyang2@...wei.com>
>
> (...)
>
>>
>> hi Cornelia Huck, Eric Farman, Zhenyu Wang, Zhi Wang
>>
>> vfio_pin_pages() accepts an array of unrelated iova pfns and processes
>> each to return the physical pfn. When dealing with large arrays of
>> contiguous iovas, vfio_iommu_type1_pin_pages is very inefficient because
>> it is processed page by page. In this case, we can divide the iova pfn
>> array into multiple continuous ranges and optimize them. I have a set
>> of performance test data for reference.
>>
>> The patch was not applied
>> 1 page 512 pages
>> no huge pages: 1638ns 223651ns
>> THP: 1668ns 222330ns
>> HugeTLB: 1526ns 208151ns
>>
>> The patch was applied
>> 1 page 512 pages
>> no huge pages 1735ns 167286ns
>> THP: 1934ns 126900ns
>> HugeTLB: 1713ns 102188ns
>>
>> As Alex Williamson said, this patch lacks proof that it works in the
>> real world. I think you will have some valuable opinions.
>
> Looking at this from the vfio-ccw angle, I'm not sure how much this
> would buy us, as we deal with IDAWs, which are designed so that they
> can be non-contiguous. I guess this depends a lot on what the guest
> does.
>
> Eric, any opinion? Do you maybe also happen to have a test setup that
> mimics workloads actually seen in the real world?
>
> .
>
Thank you for your reply. The iova array constructed using
pfn_array_alloc is continuous, and I think there will be
some performance improvements here.
Regards,
Xu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists