[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4362ac88-7514-27d2-f937-1cd405bd2e1a@digikod.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 19:35:06 +0100
From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/9] certs: Make blacklist_vet_description() more
strict
On 04/12/2020 15:09, David Howells wrote:
> Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net> wrote:
>
>> + if (*desc)
>> + /* The hash is greater than MAX_HASH_LEN. */
>> + return -EINVAL;
>
> -ENOPKG might be better. It's not that the string is invalid, it's just that
> it's unsupported at the moment.
Indeed, I'll use that.
>
> David
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists