[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3705938f-6f82-88ef-455b-e0f7459989e3@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 21:23:21 +0100
From: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] platform: surface: fix non-PM_SLEEP build warnings
On 12/11/20 8:03 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Fix build warnings when CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is not enabled and these
> functions are not used:
>
> ../drivers/platform/surface/surface_gpe.c:189:12: warning: ‘surface_gpe_resume’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> static int surface_gpe_resume(struct device *dev)
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ../drivers/platform/surface/surface_gpe.c:184:12: warning: ‘surface_gpe_suspend’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> static int surface_gpe_suspend(struct device *dev)
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Fixes: 274335f1c557 ("platform/surface: Add Driver to set up lid GPEs on MS Surface device")
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
> Cc: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com>
> Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
> Cc: platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org
> ---
> drivers/platform/surface/surface_gpe.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> --- linux-next-20201210.orig/drivers/platform/surface/surface_gpe.c
> +++ linux-next-20201210/drivers/platform/surface/surface_gpe.c
> @@ -181,6 +181,7 @@ static int surface_lid_enable_wakeup(str
> return 0;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> static int surface_gpe_suspend(struct device *dev)
> {
> return surface_lid_enable_wakeup(dev, true);
> @@ -190,6 +191,7 @@ static int surface_gpe_resume(struct dev
> {
> return surface_lid_enable_wakeup(dev, false);
> }
> +#endif
>
> static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(surface_gpe_pm, surface_gpe_suspend, surface_gpe_resume);
>
>
Right, thanks.
I assume this covers all instances of this warning in platform/surface?
Otherwise, a "platform: surface: gpe: ..." subject would make more sense.
As for the rest:
Reviewed-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com>
Regards,
Max
Powered by blists - more mailing lists