[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201212005435.0e1a0871@coco.lan>
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2020 00:54:35 +0100
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2] docs: experimental: build PDF with rst2pdf
Em Fri, 11 Dec 2020 13:48:59 -0700
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> escreveu:
> On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 09:33:32 +0100
> Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > Add an experimental PDF builder using rst2pdf
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
> > ---
> >
> > Please notice that 18 documents (of a total of 71) won't build with
> > rst2pdf. There's an opened issue about that at:
> >
> > https://github.com/rst2pdf/rst2pdf/issues/958
> >
> > v2: usage of SPHINXDIRS was fixed.
> >
> >
> > Documentation/Makefile | 5 +++++
> > Documentation/conf.py | 21 +++++++++++++++------
> > Documentation/sphinx/load_config.py | 12 ++++++++++++
> > Documentation/userspace-api/media/Makefile | 1 +
> > Makefile | 4 ++--
> > 5 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> So I would dearly love to have rst2pdf working.
>
> I applied this, then tried to see what would happen if I ran a build
> without having rst2pdf installed:
>
> > 1108 meer kernel: make htmldocs
> > SPHINX htmldocs --> file:///stuff/k/git/kernel/Documentation/output
> > make[2]: Nothing to be done for 'html'.
> > WARNING: The kernel documentation build process
> > support for Sphinx v3.0 and above is brand new. Be prepared for
> > possible issues in the generated output.
> > enabling CJK for LaTeX builder
> >
> > Extension error:
> > Could not import extension rst2pdf.pdfbuilder (exception: No module named 'rst2pdf')
> > make[1]: *** [Documentation/Makefile:91: htmldocs] Error 2
> > make: *** [Makefile:1663: htmldocs] Error 2
>
> Methinks it's perhaps not quite ready for linux-next yet :)
Well, I haven't test this.
I'm not an usual python programmer, so, don't know much about its
specifics... Yet, I would be expecting that something like this:
try:
extensions.append("rst2pdf.pdfbuilder")
except:
sys.stderr.write('rst2pdf extension not available.\n')
Would avoid it to crash, if the extension is not available.
Silly me :-)
Still, I suspect that it should not be hard to modify the above to
avoid the crash.
I shouldn't be doing much development those days, as I'm taking
some vacations, after sending media stuff for 5.11.
So, if you have a better idea about how to optionally probe an
extension, feel free to modify my patch.
> With rst2pdf installed I get a bunch of zero-length files, as promised.
> Pretty much none of the larger "books" make it through.
Yeah. I guess one of the issues is with tables that don't fit into
a single page.
Yet, devicetree book is empty. That sounds really weird, as there are
few files on it, and I didn't see anything uncommon on the rst files.
> It's a start,
> though. I'll happily apply this as a step forward once it doesn't break
> the docs build if rst2pdf is missing.
Sounds like a plan.
Thanks,
Mauro
Powered by blists - more mailing lists