[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87czzhi40y.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 01:23:57 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 4/8] rtc: core: Make the sync offset default more realistic
Alexandre,
On Fri, Dec 11 2020 at 00:59, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 06/12/2020 22:46:17+0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> /* Drivers can revise this default after allocating the device. */
>> - rtc->set_offset_nsec = NSEC_PER_SEC / 2;
>> + rtc->set_offset_nsec = 10 * NSEC_PER_MSEC;
>
> I did retest, on a slow 100kHz i2c bus, with a fairly inconvenient RTC,
> The maximum offset to set the RTC was 4845533ns so I'd say 10ms is too
> large. Should we make that 5ms ?
Sure. As I said I pulled the 10 out of thin air.
> Apart from that, on the series, you can add my
> Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
I'll amend the s/10/5/ throughout the series while queueing the whole
pile in the timers/core branch unless you want it to be handled
differently.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists