linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mailbox: qcom-apcs-ipc: use PLATFORM_DEVID

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 10 Dec 2020 22:16:42 -0600
From:   Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To:     Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
Cc:     Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...il.com>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mailbox: qcom-apcs-ipc: use PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO to
 register device

On Mon 12 Oct 21:12 CDT 2020, Shawn Guo wrote:

> On MSM8916, only one qcom-apcs-msm8916-clk device is needed, as there is
> only one APCS clock.  However, on MSM8939 three APCS clocks need to be
> registered for cluster0 (little cores), cluster1 (big cores) and CCI
> (Cache Coherent Interconnect).  That said, we will need to register 3
> qcom-apcs-msm8916-clk devices.  Let's use PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO rather
> than PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE for platform_device_register_data() call.
> Otherwise, the second APCS clock registration will fail due to duplicate
> device name.
> 
> [    0.519657] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/bus/platform/devices/qcom-apcs-msm8916-clk'
> ...
> [    0.661158] qcom_apcs_ipc b111000.mailbox: failed to register APCS clk
> 

Spotted this as I was looking for another patch, hence the late reply.
But it seems this was never reviewed or merged.

What does the bigger picture look like? Do we have 3 APCS global, or
it's a single memory region that provides the 3 clocks? How does the
qcom-apcs-msm8916-clk with it's hard coded offset of 0x50 deal with
this? (Is this a single qcom-apcs-msm8939-clk that registers 3 clocks
instead? Making this patch unnecessary?)

Regards,
Bjorn

> Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/mailbox/qcom-apcs-ipc-mailbox.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/qcom-apcs-ipc-mailbox.c b/drivers/mailbox/qcom-apcs-ipc-mailbox.c
> index 077e5c6a9ef7..3d100a004760 100644
> --- a/drivers/mailbox/qcom-apcs-ipc-mailbox.c
> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/qcom-apcs-ipc-mailbox.c
> @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ static int qcom_apcs_ipc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (apcs_data->clk_name) {
>  		apcs->clk = platform_device_register_data(&pdev->dev,
>  							  apcs_data->clk_name,
> -							  PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
> +							  PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO,
>  							  NULL, 0);
>  		if (IS_ERR(apcs->clk))
>  			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to register APCS clk\n");
> -- 
> 2.17.1
>