[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201211065850.GB587@js1304-desktop>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 15:58:51 +0900
From: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: rcu@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...com, mingo@...nel.org, jiangshanlai@...il.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
andrii@...nel.org, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 sl-b 1/6] mm: Add mem_dump_obj() to print source of
memory block
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 07:42:27PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 07:33:59PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 11:22:10AM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 05:19:58PM -0800, paulmck@...nel.org wrote:
> > > > From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
>
> [ . . . ]
>
> > > We can get some infos even if CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG isn't defined.
> > > Please move them out.
> >
> > I guess since I worry about CONFIG_MMU=n it only makes sense to also
> > worry about CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG=n. Fix update.
>
> Like this? (Patch on top of the series, to be folded into the first one.)
Yes!
Acked-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists