[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201211103443.GA12091@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 12:34:43 +0200
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: Adrian Ratiu <adrian.ratiu@...labora.com>
Cc: linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...labora.com,
"dlaurie@...omium.org" <dlaurie@...omium.org>,
Helen Koike <helen.koike@...labora.com>,
Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] char: tpm: add i2c driver for cr50
On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 02:41:45PM +0200, Adrian Ratiu wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Dec 2020, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 04:20:16PM +0200, Adrian Ratiu wrote:
> > > From: "dlaurie@...omium.org" <dlaurie@...omium.org> Add TPM 2.0
> > > compatible I2C interface for chips with cr50 firmware. The firmware
> > > running on the currently supported H1 MCU requires a special driver
> > > to handle its specific protocol, and this makes it unsuitable to use
> > > tpm_tis_core_* and instead it must implement the underlying TPM
> > > protocol similar to the other I2C TPM drivers. - All 4 bytes of
> > > status register must be read/written at once. - FIFO and burst
> > > count is limited to 63 and must be drained by AP. - Provides an
> > > interrupt to indicate when read response data is ready and when the
> > > TPM is finished processing write data. This driver is based on the
> > > existing infineon I2C TPM driver, which most closely matches the
> > > cr50 i2c protocol behavior.
> >
> > Starts to look legit. Has anyone tested this?
>
> I tested on an x86_64 Chromebook EVE (aka Google Pixelbook) by chainloading
> in legacy mode and booting into a Yocto-based userspace (meta-chromebook)
> where I used tpm2-tools to communicate with the chip and also built and
> tested a ChromiumOS userspace in developer mode.
>
> I do not have access to other HW which has this chip, so it is about as much
> testing I can do to confirm the driver works on this HW.
>
> Adrian
So can you respond to this with tested-by. It's sufficient because
collateral effects of driver failing are insignificant for the kernel
as whole.
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists