| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 11:41:36 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.de>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] net/ipv4/inet_fragment: Batch fqdir destroy works
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 11:33 AM SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 09:43:41 +0100 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 9:21 AM SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.de>
> > >
> > > For each 'fqdir_exit()' call, a work for destroy of the 'fqdir' is
> > > enqueued. The work function, 'fqdir_work_fn()', internally calls
> > > 'rcu_barrier()'. In case of intensive 'fqdir_exit()' (e.g., frequent
> > > 'unshare()' systemcalls), this increased contention could result in
> > > unacceptably high latency of 'rcu_barrier()'. This commit avoids such
> > > contention by doing the 'rcu_barrier()' and subsequent lightweight works
> > > in a batched manner using a dedicated singlethread worker, as similar to
> > > that of 'cleanup_net()'.
> >
> >
> > Not sure why you submit a patch series with a single patch.
> >
> > Your cover letter contains interesting info that would better be
> > captured in this changelog IMO
>
> I thought someone might think this is not a kernel issue but the reproducer is
> insane or 'rcu_barrier()' needs modification. I wanted to do such discussion
> on the coverletter. Seems I misjudged. I will make this single patch and move
> the detailed information here from the next version.
>
> >
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.de>
> > > ---
> > > include/net/inet_frag.h | 1 +
> > > net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > > 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/net/inet_frag.h b/include/net/inet_frag.h
> > > index bac79e817776..48cc5795ceda 100644
> > > --- a/include/net/inet_frag.h
> > > +++ b/include/net/inet_frag.h
> > > @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ struct fqdir {
> > > /* Keep atomic mem on separate cachelines in structs that include it */
> > > atomic_long_t mem ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
> > > struct work_struct destroy_work;
> > > + struct llist_node free_list;
> > > };
> > >
> > > /**
> > > diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c b/net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c
> > > index 10d31733297d..a6fc4afcc323 100644
> > > --- a/net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c
> > > +++ b/net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c
> > > @@ -145,12 +145,17 @@ static void inet_frags_free_cb(void *ptr, void *arg)
> > > inet_frag_destroy(fq);
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static void fqdir_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
> > > +static struct workqueue_struct *fqdir_wq;
> > > +static LLIST_HEAD(free_list);
> > > +
> > > +static void fqdir_free_fn(struct work_struct *work)
> > > {
> > > - struct fqdir *fqdir = container_of(work, struct fqdir, destroy_work);
> > > - struct inet_frags *f = fqdir->f;
> > > + struct llist_node *kill_list;
> > > + struct fqdir *fqdir, *tmp;
> > > + struct inet_frags *f;
> > >
> > > - rhashtable_free_and_destroy(&fqdir->rhashtable, inet_frags_free_cb, NULL);
> > > + /* Atomically snapshot the list of fqdirs to free */
> > > + kill_list = llist_del_all(&free_list);
> > >
> > > /* We need to make sure all ongoing call_rcu(..., inet_frag_destroy_rcu)
> > > * have completed, since they need to dereference fqdir.
> > > @@ -158,12 +163,38 @@ static void fqdir_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
> > > */
> > > rcu_barrier();
> > >
> > > - if (refcount_dec_and_test(&f->refcnt))
> > > - complete(&f->completion);
> > > + llist_for_each_entry_safe(fqdir, tmp, kill_list, free_list) {
> > > + f = fqdir->f;
> > > + if (refcount_dec_and_test(&f->refcnt))
> > > + complete(&f->completion);
> > >
> > > - kfree(fqdir);
> > > + kfree(fqdir);
> > > + }
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static DECLARE_WORK(fqdir_free_work, fqdir_free_fn);
> > > +
> > > +static void fqdir_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
> > > +{
> > > + struct fqdir *fqdir = container_of(work, struct fqdir, destroy_work);
> > > +
> > > + rhashtable_free_and_destroy(&fqdir->rhashtable, inet_frags_free_cb, NULL);
> > > +
> > > + if (llist_add(&fqdir->free_list, &free_list))
> > > + queue_work(fqdir_wq, &fqdir_free_work);
> >
> > I think you misunderstood me.
> >
> > Since this fqdir_free_work will have at most one instance, you can use
> > system_wq here, there is no risk of abuse.
> >
> > My suggestion was to not use system_wq for fqdir_exit(), to better
> > control the number
> > of threads in rhashtable cleanups.
> >
> > void fqdir_exit(struct fqdir *fqdir)
> > {
> > INIT_WORK(&fqdir->destroy_work, fqdir_work_fn);
> > - queue_work(system_wq, &fqdir->destroy_work);
> > + queue_work(fqdir_wq, &fqdir->destroy_work);
> > }
>
> Oh, got it. I definitely misunderstood. My fault, sorry.
>
> >
> >
> >
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int __init fqdir_wq_init(void)
> > > +{
> > > + fqdir_wq = create_singlethread_workqueue("fqdir");
> >
> >
> > And here, I suggest to use a non ordered work queue, allowing one
> > thread per cpu, to allow concurrent rhashtable cleanups
> >
> > Also "fqdir" name is rather vague, this is an implementation detail ?
> >
> > fqdir_wq =create_workqueue("inet_frag_wq");
>
> So, what you are suggesting is to use a dedicated non-ordered work queue
> (fqdir_wq) for rhashtable cleanup and do the remaining works with system_wq in
> the batched manner, right? IOW, doing below change on top of this patch.
>
> --- a/net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c
> @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ static void inet_frags_free_cb(void *ptr, void *arg)
> inet_frag_destroy(fq);
> }
>
> -static struct workqueue_struct *fqdir_wq;
> +static struct workqueue_struct *inet_frag_wq;
> static LLIST_HEAD(free_list);
Nit : Please prefix this free_list , like fqdir_free_list to avoid
namespace pollution.
>
> static void fqdir_free_fn(struct work_struct *work)
> @@ -181,14 +181,14 @@ static void fqdir_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
> rhashtable_free_and_destroy(&fqdir->rhashtable, inet_frags_free_cb, NULL);
>
> if (llist_add(&fqdir->free_list, &free_list))
> - queue_work(fqdir_wq, &fqdir_free_work);
> + queue_work(system_wq, &fqdir_free_work);
> }
>
> static int __init fqdir_wq_init(void)
> {
> - fqdir_wq = create_singlethread_workqueue("fqdir");
> - if (!fqdir_wq)
> - panic("Could not create fqdir workq");
> + inet_frag_wq = create_workqueue("inet_frag_wq");
> + if (!inet_frag_wq)
> + panic("Could not create inet frag workq");
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(fqdir_init);
> void fqdir_exit(struct fqdir *fqdir)
> {
> INIT_WORK(&fqdir->destroy_work, fqdir_work_fn);
> - queue_work(system_wq, &fqdir->destroy_work);
> + queue_work(inet_frag_wq, &fqdir->destroy_work);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(fqdir_exit);
>
> If I'm still misunderstanding, please let me know.
>
I think that with the above changes, we should be good ;)
Thanks !
Powered by blists - more mailing lists