[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <TY2PR01MB369280691E2EC3CA81E8A68BD8CA0@TY2PR01MB3692.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 11:35:11 +0000
From: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>
To: "Vaittinen, Matti" <Matti.Vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
CC: "marek.vasut+renesas@...il.com" <marek.vasut+renesas@...il.com>,
"geert+renesas@...der.be" <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Khiem Nguyen <khiem.nguyen.xt@...esas.com>,
"linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"lee.jones@...aro.org" <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/3] mfd: bd9571mwv: Add support for BD9574MWF
Hi again,
> From: Yoshihiro Shimoda, Sent: Friday, December 11, 2020 9:49 AM
> <snip>
> > but as I said - these are only 'nit' comments and I am not insisting on
> > changing these. Especially since some of the comments are more related
> > to changing the original bd9571mwv than adding support for this new IC.
> > I just think one might be able to make this a little bit simpler :)
>
> I got it :) For now, I would like to focus adding BD9574MWF support at first.
> After that, I'll try to clean-up these drivers later.
JFYI.
I submitted v2 patch series with this clean up because this is needed
to avoid "struct bd957x_data" in the include/linux/mfd/bd9571mwv.h.
Best regards,
Yoshihiro Shimoda
Powered by blists - more mailing lists