[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201211124725.GD552508@nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 08:47:25 -0400
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the tip
tree
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 07:56:54PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in:
>
> mm/gup.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 2a4a06da8a4b ("mm/gup: Provide gup_get_pte() more generic")
>
> from the tip tree and commit:
>
> 1eb2fe862a51 ("mm/gup: combine put_compound_head() and unpin_user_page()")
>
> from the akpm-current tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
Looks OK
Thanks,
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists