[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cc2085ca-ada9-d616-eed5-3496889da3bb@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 14:17:55 +0100
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: rui.zhang@...el.com
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
amitk@...nel.org, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thermal/core: Make 'forced_passive' as obsolete candidate
On 08/12/2020 16:30, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> The passive file in sysfs forces the usage of a passive trip point set
> by the userspace when a broken BIOS does not provide the mitigation
> temperature for such thermal zone. The hardware evolved a lot since
> 2008 as a good thermal management is no longer an option.
>
> Linux on the other side also provides now a way to load fixed ACPI
> table via the option ACPI_TABLE_UPGRADE, so additionnal trip point
> could be added there.
>
> Set the option obsolete and plan to remove it, so the corresponding
> code can be removed from the core code and allow more cleanups the
> thermal framework deserves.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
> ---
Is there any concern about this change ?
> Documentation/ABI/obsolete/sysfs-thermal-passive | 13 +++++++++++++
> drivers/thermal/thermal_sysfs.c | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/ABI/obsolete/sysfs-thermal-passive
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/obsolete/sysfs-thermal-passive b/Documentation/ABI/obsolete/sysfs-thermal-passive
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..2510724cc165
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/obsolete/sysfs-thermal-passive
> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
> +What: /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone*/passive
> +Date: December 2008
> +KernelVersion: 2.6.28
> +Contact: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
> +Description:
> +
> + The passive file in sysfs forces the usage of a passive trip point
> + set by the userspace when a broken BIOS does not provide the
> + mitigation temperature for such thermal zone. However, the Linux
> + kernel evolved a lot since 2008 as well as the hardware and it is
> + able to manage correctly the thermal envelope. It does also provide
> + a way to load fixed ACPI table via the option ACPI_TABLE_UPGRADE, so
> + additionnal trip point could be added there.
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/thermal_sysfs.c b/drivers/thermal/thermal_sysfs.c
> index 0866e949339b..578099b520b1 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/thermal_sysfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/thermal_sysfs.c
> @@ -232,6 +232,8 @@ passive_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> if (state && state < 1000)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + pr_warn("%s: Consider the 'passive' option obsolete\n", tz->type);
> +
> if (state && !tz->forced_passive) {
> if (!tz->passive_delay)
> tz->passive_delay = 1000;
>
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists