lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201211170915.4bs2huyptnsmlwvf@linutronix.de>
Date:   Fri, 11 Dec 2020 18:09:15 +0100
From:   Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To:     linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        "Ahmed S . Darwish" <a.darwish@...utronix.de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] sr: Remove in_interrupt() usage in sr_init_command().

On 2020-12-04 17:48:50 [+0100], To linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org wrote:
> The in_interrupt() check in sr_init_command() is a leftover from the
> past, pre v2.3.16 era to be exact. Back then the ioctl() was served by
> `sr' itself and sector size changes by CDROMREADMODE2 (as noted in the
> comment) were accounted within sr's data structures which allowed a
> "lazy" reset so it could be skipped on the next request and reset back
> to the default value once the device node was closed or before a command
> from the blockqueue was issued.
> 
> This does not work like that anymore. The CDROMREADMODE2 is served by
> cdrom's mmc_ioctl() function which may change the sector size but the
> `sr' driver does not learn about it and so its ->sector_size is not
> updated.
> The ioctl() resets the changed sector size back to 2048.
> sr_read_sector() also resets the sector size back to the default once it
> is done.
> 
> Remove the conditional sector size update from sr_init_command() and
> sr_release() because it is not needed.
> 
> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201204164803.ovwurzs3257em2rp@linutronix.de
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>

Any chance to get this reviewed/merged?

Sebastian

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ