linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] spi: dt-bindings: clarify CS behavior for spi-cs-high and gpio descriptors

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <160770909979.26609.3989372028641790318.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 11 Dec 2020 17:51:39 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@...delico.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, linus.walleij@...aro.org
Cc:     thesven73@...il.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, letux-kernel@...nphoenux.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com,
        andreas@...nade.info, kernel@...a-handheld.com, lukas@...ner.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: dt-bindings: clarify CS behavior for spi-cs-high and gpio descriptors

On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 10:57:44 +0100, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> Behavior of CS signal in combination of spi-cs-high and gpio descriptors
> is not clearly defined and documented. So clarify the documentation

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] spi: dt-bindings: clarify CS behavior for spi-cs-high and gpio descriptors
      commit: 2fee9583198eb97b5351feda7bd825e0f778385c

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark