linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 16/17] driver core: Refactor fw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <813b3fbd80ad4dfee7ff8517d4829a1f@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 11 Dec 2020 18:03:15 +0000
From:   Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To:     Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
Cc:     Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, Qian Cai <qcai@...hat.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        linux-efi <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 16/17] driver core: Refactor fw_devlink feature

On 2020-12-11 17:51, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 8:34 AM Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com> 
> wrote:
>> 
>> On 2020-12-11 14:11, Qian Cai wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2020-11-20 at 18:02 -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote:
>> >> The current implementation of fw_devlink is very inefficient because it
>> >> tries to get away without creating fwnode links in the name of saving
>> >> memory usage. Past attempts to optimize runtime at the cost of memory
>> >> usage were blocked with request for data showing that the optimization
>> >> made significant improvement for real world scenarios.
>> >>
>> >> We have those scenarios now. There have been several reports of boot
>> >> time increase in the order of seconds in this thread [1]. Several OEMs
>> >> and SoC manufacturers have also privately reported significant
>> >> (350-400ms) increase in boot time due to all the parsing done by
>> >> fw_devlink.
>> >>
>> >> So this patch uses all the setup done by the previous patches in this
>> >> series to refactor fw_devlink to be more efficient. Most of the code has
>> >> been moved out of firmware specific (DT mostly) code into driver core.
>> >>
>> >> This brings the following benefits:
>> >> - Instead of parsing the device tree multiple times during bootup,
>> >>    fw_devlink parses each fwnode node/property only once and creates
>> >>    fwnode links. The rest of the fw_devlink code then just looks at these
>> >>    fwnode links to do rest of the work.
>> >>
>> >> - Makes it much easier to debug probe issue due to fw_devlink in the
>> >>    future. fw_devlink=on blocks the probing of devices if they depend on
>> >>    a device that hasn't been added yet. With this refactor, it'll be very
>> >>    easy to tell what that device is because we now have a reference to
>> >>    the fwnode of the device.
>> >>
>> >> - Much easier to add fw_devlink support to ACPI and other firmware
>> >>    types. A refactor to move the common bits from DT specific code to
>> >>    driver core was in my TODO list as a prerequisite to adding ACPI
>> >>    support to fw_devlink. This series gets that done.
>> >>
>> >> [1] - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-omap/ea02f57e-871d-cd16-4418-c1da4bbc4696@ti.com/
>> >> Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
>> >> Tested-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
>> >> Tested-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
>> >
>> > Reverting this commit and its dependency:
>> >
>> > 2d09e6eb4a6f driver core: Delete pointless parameter in fwnode_operations.add_links
>> >
>> > from today's linux-next fixed a boot crash on an arm64 Thunder X2 server.
>> 
>> Since the call stack implicates the platform-device-wrangling we do in
>> IORT code I took a quick look; AFAICS my guess would be it's blowing 
>> up
>> trying to walk a zeroed list head since "driver core: Add 
>> fwnode_init()"
>> missed acpi_alloc_fwnode_static().
> 
> Thanks Robin. I'm pretty sure this is the reason. I thought I fixed
> all ACPI cases, but clearly I missed this one. I'll send out a patch
> for this today. If you think there are any other places I missed
> please let me know. I'll try some git grep foo to see if I missed any
> other instances of fwnode ops being set.

Yup, that fixed it here (QDF2400).

Thanks,

         M.

diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
index 39263c6b52e1..2630c2e953f7 100644
--- a/include/linux/acpi.h
+++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ static inline struct fwnode_handle 
*acpi_alloc_fwnode_static(void)
  	if (!fwnode)
  		return NULL;

-	fwnode->ops = &acpi_static_fwnode_ops;
+	fwnode_init(fwnode, &acpi_static_fwnode_ops);

  	return fwnode;
  }



-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...