[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2020 10:39:32 +0200
From: Yonatan Linik <yonatanlinik@...il.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
john.ogness@...utronix.de, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Mao Wenan <maowenan@...wei.com>,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
orcohen@...oaltonetworks.com, Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] net: Fix use of proc_fs
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 11:00 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Another option would be to just ignore the return code here
> and continue without a procfs file, regardless of whether procfs
> is enabled or not.
>
> Arnd
Yes I thought about that, but I didn't want to make changes to the way
it behaved when procfs was enabled.
If you decide that's a better solution I will happily change it.
--
Yonatan Linik
Powered by blists - more mailing lists