linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] Compiler Attributes: remove CONFIG_ENABLE_MUST

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 13 Dec 2020 16:27:14 +0100
From:   Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        "Jason A . Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
        Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        wireguard@...ts.zx2c4.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Compiler Attributes: remove CONFIG_ENABLE_MUST_CHECK

On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 4:16 PM Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> Because if you get a report of something breaking for your change, you
> need to work to resolve it, not argue about it.  Otherwise it needs to
> be dropped/reverted.

Nobody has argued that. In fact, I explicitly said the opposite: "So I
think we can fix them as they come.".

I am expecting Masahiro to follow up. It has been less than 24 hours
since the report, on a weekend.

Cheers,
Miguel