[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201213171237.4dfe58f5@archlinux>
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2020 17:12:37 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] iio:pressure:ms5637: introduce hardware
differentiation
On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 00:48:53 +0100
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com> wrote:
> Some sensors in the ms58xx family have a different PROM length and a
> different number of available resolution. introduce struct ms_tp_hw_data to
Introduce
> handle those differences.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
> ---
> .../iio/common/ms_sensors/ms_sensors_i2c.h | 11 ++++++
> drivers/iio/pressure/ms5637.c | 35 +++++++++++++++----
> 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/common/ms_sensors/ms_sensors_i2c.h b/drivers/iio/common/ms_sensors/ms_sensors_i2c.h
> index bad09c80e47a..f4a88148c113 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/common/ms_sensors/ms_sensors_i2c.h
> +++ b/drivers/iio/common/ms_sensors/ms_sensors_i2c.h
> @@ -25,6 +25,16 @@ struct ms_ht_dev {
> u8 res_index;
> };
>
> +/**
> + * struct ms_hw_data - Temperature/Pressure sensor hardware data
> + * @prom_len: number of words in the PROM
> + * @max_res_index: maximum sensor resolution index
> + */
> +struct ms_tp_hw_data {
> + u8 prom_len;
> + u8 max_res_index;
> +};
> +
> /**
> * struct ms_tp_dev - Temperature/Pressure sensor device structure
> * @client: i2c client
> @@ -36,6 +46,7 @@ struct ms_ht_dev {
> struct ms_tp_dev {
> struct i2c_client *client;
> struct mutex lock;
> + const struct ms_tp_hw_data *hw;
> u16 prom[MS_SENSORS_TP_PROM_WORDS_NB + 1];
> u8 res_index;
> };
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/pressure/ms5637.c b/drivers/iio/pressure/ms5637.c
> index 7c3f0ccd917c..351bfdb24fb4 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/pressure/ms5637.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/pressure/ms5637.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,11 @@
>
> #include "../common/ms_sensors/ms_sensors_i2c.h"
>
> +struct ms_tp_data {
> + const char *name;
> + const struct ms_tp_hw_data *hw;
> +};
> +
> static const int ms5637_samp_freq[6] = { 960, 480, 240, 120, 60, 30 };
> /* String copy of the above const for readability purpose */
> static const char ms5637_show_samp_freq[] = "960 480 240 120 60 30";
> @@ -128,6 +133,7 @@ static const struct iio_info ms5637_info = {
>
> static int ms5637_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> {
> + const struct ms_tp_data *data = device_get_match_data(&client->dev);
As a follow up to the earlier fun with greybus etc, have to jump through
some hoops to have a fallback here if we have a firmware type that can't
do get_match_data driver/base/sw_node.c is the one greybus is using.
We have drivers that don't do this because frankly I didn't know about it
until a month or two ago. However, I'm not keen to introduce any
more.
Thanks,
Jonathan
> struct ms_tp_dev *dev_data;
> struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
> int ret;
> @@ -147,11 +153,12 @@ static int ms5637_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>
> dev_data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> dev_data->client = client;
> - dev_data->res_index = 5;
> + dev_data->res_index = data->hw->max_res_index;
> + dev_data->hw = data->hw;
> mutex_init(&dev_data->lock);
>
> indio_dev->info = &ms5637_info;
> - indio_dev->name = device_get_match_data(&client->dev);
> + indio_dev->name = data->name;
> indio_dev->modes = INDIO_DIRECT_MODE;
> indio_dev->channels = ms5637_channels;
> indio_dev->num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(ms5637_channels);
> @@ -169,11 +176,27 @@ static int ms5637_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> return devm_iio_device_register(&client->dev, indio_dev);
> }
>
> +static const struct ms_tp_hw_data ms5637_hw_data = {
> + .prom_len = 7,
> + .max_res_index = 5
> +};
> +
> +static const struct ms_tp_data ms5637_data = { .name = "ms5637", .hw = &ms5637_hw_data };
> +
> +static const struct ms_tp_data ms5805_data = { .name = "ms5805", .hw = &ms5637_hw_data };
> +
> +static const struct ms_tp_data ms5837_data = { .name = "ms5837", .hw = &ms5637_hw_data };
> +
> +static const struct ms_tp_data ms8607_data = {
> + .name = "ms8607-temppressure",
> + .hw = &ms5637_hw_data,
> +};
> +
> static const struct of_device_id ms5637_of_match[] = {
> - { .compatible = "meas,ms5637", .data = "ms5637" },
> - { .compatible = "meas,ms5805", .data = "ms5805" },
> - { .compatible = "meas,ms5837", .data = "ms5837" },
> - { .compatible = "meas,ms8607-temppressure", .data = "ms8607-temppressure" },
> + { .compatible = "meas,ms5637", .data = &ms5637_data },
> + { .compatible = "meas,ms5805", .data = &ms5805_data },
> + { .compatible = "meas,ms5837", .data = &ms5837_data },
> + { .compatible = "meas,ms8607-temppressure", .data = &ms8607_data },
> { },
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ms5637_of_match);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists