lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2020 19:00:59 -0000 From: "tip-bot2 for Zhouyi Zhou" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de> To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org Cc: Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@...il.com>, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: [tip: core/rcu] rcu: Fix a typo in rcu_blocking_is_gp() header comment The following commit has been merged into the core/rcu branch of tip: Commit-ID: 354c3f0e22dcb17c10d0b79f6e1c5ba286eec0b0 Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/354c3f0e22dcb17c10d0b79f6e1c5ba286eec0b0 Author: Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@...il.com> AuthorDate: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 03:53:03 Committer: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org> CommitterDate: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 19:37:17 -08:00 rcu: Fix a typo in rcu_blocking_is_gp() header comment This commit fixes a typo in the rcu_blocking_is_gp() function's header comment. Signed-off-by: Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@...il.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org> --- kernel/rcu/tree.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c index 3438534..0f278d6 100644 --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c @@ -3572,7 +3572,7 @@ void __init kfree_rcu_scheduler_running(void) * During early boot, any blocking grace-period wait automatically * implies a grace period. Later on, this is never the case for PREEMPTION. * - * Howevr, because a context switch is a grace period for !PREEMPTION, any + * However, because a context switch is a grace period for !PREEMPTION, any * blocking grace-period wait automatically implies a grace period if * there is only one CPU online at any point time during execution of * either synchronize_rcu() or synchronize_rcu_expedited(). It is OK to
Powered by blists - more mailing lists