[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <27e7d73b-1200-a9f1-94e3-5e494f54e49e@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2020 19:31:01 -0800
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...dia.com>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...dia.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>,
Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@...dekranz.com>,
Marek Behun <marek.behun@....cz>,
Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Alexandra Winter <wintera@...ux.ibm.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>,
Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 3/6] net: dsa: move switchdev event
implementation under the same switch/case statement
On 12/12/2020 6:40 PM, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> We'll need to start listening to SWITCHDEV_FDB_{ADD,DEL}_TO_DEVICE
> events even for interfaces where dsa_slave_dev_check returns false, so
> we need that check inside the switch-case statement for SWITCHDEV_FDB_*.
>
> This movement also avoids a useless allocation / free of switchdev_work
> on the untreated "default event" case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists