linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] leds: Use DEVICE_ATTR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANiq72kOE3Y0Jji=igG_vqu0MoZyGeJJSfNWwj3ZA4oSikG9eQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 13 Dec 2020 20:46:46 +0100
From:   Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:     Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>,
        Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>,
        linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds: Use DEVICE_ATTR_{RW, RO, WO} macros

On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 7:21 PM Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
>
> clang-format is not a tool to rewrite code only neaten its layout.
>
> coccinelle _might_ be able to do this for limited cases where the
> show function is in the same compilation unit/file, but even then
> it would not be a trivial script.

+1 The most robust approach, but the one that is most involved, would
be a clang-tidy check.

Cheers,
Miguel