lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201214001310.2cb6f1ff.pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Mon, 14 Dec 2020 00:13:10 +0100
From:   Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, borntraeger@...ibm.com, cohuck@...hat.com,
        alex.williamson@...hat.com, kwankhede@...dia.com, david@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390/vfio-ap: Clean up vfio_ap resources when KVM
 pointer invalidated

On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 16:08:53 -0500
Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:

> >>> +static void vfio_ap_mdev_put_kvm(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev)
> >>> +{
> >>> +	if (matrix_mdev->kvm) {
> >>> +		kvm_arch_crypto_clear_masks(matrix_mdev->kvm);
> >>> +		matrix_mdev->kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook = NULL;
> >>> +		vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queues(matrix_mdev->mdev);  
> >> This reset probably does not belong here since there is no
> >> reason to reset the queues in the group notifier (see below).  
> > What about kvm_s390_gisc_unregister()? That needs a valid kvm
> > pointer, or? Or is it OK to not pair a kvm_s390_gisc_register()
> > with an kvm_s390_gisc_unregister()?  
> 
> I probably should have been more specific about what I meant.
> I was thinking that the reset should not be dependent upon
> whether there is a KVM pointer or not since this function is
> also called from the release callback. On the other hand,
> the vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queues function calls the
> vfio_ap_irq_disable (AQIC) function after each queue is reset.
> The vfio_ap_irq_disable function also cleans up the AQIC
> resources which requires that the KVM point is valid, so if
> the vfio_ap_reset_queues function is not called with a
> valid KVM pointer, that could result in an exception.
> 
> The thing is, it is unnecessary to disable interrupts after
> resetting a queue because the reset disables interrupts,
> so I think I should include a patch for this fix that does the
> following:
> 
> 1. Removes the disabling of interrupts subsequent to resetting
>      a queue.
> 2. Includes the cleanup of AQIC resources when a queue is
>      reset if a KVM pointer is present.

Sounds like a plan. I see, in your v2 vfio_ap_mdev_unset_kvm()
does call vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queues() even when called from the
group notifier. I also like that the cleanup of AQIC resources is
a part of queue_reset. In fact I asked a while ago (Message-ID:
<20201027074846.30ee0ddc.pasic@...ux.ibm.com> in October) to make
vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue() call vfio_ap_free_aqic_resources(q).

Regards,
Halil 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ