lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 13 Dec 2020 06:04:14 +0100
From:   Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        "Jason A . Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
        Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        wireguard@...ts.zx2c4.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Compiler Attributes: remove CONFIG_ENABLE_MUST_CHECK

On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 5:18 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
>
> This patch results in:
>
> arch/sh/kernel/cpu/sh4a/smp-shx3.c: In function 'shx3_prepare_cpus':
> arch/sh/kernel/cpu/sh4a/smp-shx3.c:76:3: error: ignoring return value of 'request_irq' declared with attribute 'warn_unused_result'
>
> when building sh:defconfig. Checking for calls to request_irq()
> suggests that there will be other similar errors in various builds.
> Reverting the patch fixes the problem.

Which ones? From a quick grep and some filtering I could only find one
file with wrong usage apart from this one:

    drivers/net/ethernet/lantiq_etop.c:
request_irq(irq, ltq_etop_dma_irq, 0, "etop_tx", priv);
    drivers/net/ethernet/lantiq_etop.c:
request_irq(irq, ltq_etop_dma_irq, 0, "etop_rx", priv);

Of course, this does not cover other functions, but it means there
aren't many issues and/or people building the code if nobody complains
within a few weeks. So I think we can fix them as they come.

Cheers,
Miguel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists