linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] backlight: rt4831: Adds DT binding document for Richtek RT4831 backlight

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 14 Dec 2020 17:17:43 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     ChiYuan Huang <u0084500@...il.com>
Cc:     Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        cy_huang <cy_huang@...htek.com>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] backlight: rt4831: Adds DT binding document for
 Richtek RT4831 backlight

On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 10:40:55PM +0800, ChiYuan Huang wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org> 於 2020年12月14日 週一 下午5:59寫道：
> >
> > Hi CY
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 12:33:43AM +0800, cy_huang wrote:
> > > From: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@...htek.com>
> > >
> > > Adds DT binding document for Richtek RT4831 backlight.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@...htek.com>
> >
> > This patch got keyword filtered and brought to my attention
> > but the rest of the series did not.
> >
> > If it was a backlight patch series you need to send it To: the
> > all the backlight maintainers.
> >
> Yes, I'm waiting for mfd reviewing.
> Due to mfd patch, I need to add backlight dt-binding patch prior to
> backlight source code.
> Or autobuild robot will said mfd dt-binding build fail from Rob.
> That's why I send the backlight dt-binding prior to the source code.
> 
> I still have backlight/regulator source code patch after mfd reviewing.
> Do you want me to send all the patches without waiting for mfd reviewing?

What happened to the regulator part of the binding? I said you could 
merge it into the mfd schema, not drop it. Bindings should be complete 
so we get a full picture of a device.

Rob