linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] mm/gup: migrate pinned pages out of movable zone

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201214141946.GG32193@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date:   Mon, 14 Dec 2020 15:19:46 +0100
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
To:     Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, vbabka@...e.cz, david@...hat.com,
        osalvador@...e.de, dan.j.williams@...el.com, sashal@...nel.org,
        tyhicks@...ux.microsoft.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@....com,
        mike.kravetz@...cle.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, mingo@...hat.com,
        jgg@...pe.ca, peterz@...radead.org, mgorman@...e.de,
        willy@...radead.org, rientjes@...gle.com, jhubbard@...dia.com,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] mm/gup: migrate pinned pages out of movable zone

On Fri 11-12-20 15:21:39, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
[...]
> diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> index b593316bff3d..25c0c13ba4b1 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> @@ -386,9 +386,14 @@ enum zone_type {
>  	 * likely to succeed, and to locally limit unmovable allocations - e.g.,
>  	 * to increase the number of THP/huge pages. Notable special cases are:
>  	 *
> -	 * 1. Pinned pages: (long-term) pinning of movable pages might
> -	 *    essentially turn such pages unmovable. Memory offlining might
> -	 *    retry a long time.
> +	 * 1. Pinned pages: (long-term) pinning of movable pages is avoided
> +	 *    when pages are pinned and faulted, but it is still possible that
> +	 *    address space already has pages in ZONE_MOVABLE at the time when
> +	 *    pages are pinned (i.e. user has touches that memory before
> +	 *    pinning). In such case we try to migrate them to a different zone,
> +	 *    but if migration fails the pages can still end-up pinned in
> +	 *    ZONE_MOVABLE. In such case, memory offlining might retry a long
> +	 *    time and will only succeed once user application unpins pages.

I do agree with others in the thread. This is not really helping out the
current situation much. You should simply fail the pin rather than
pretend all is just fine.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs