lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201214145308.GG67148@shao2-debian>
Date:   Mon, 14 Dec 2020 22:53:08 +0800
From:   kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkp@...ts.01.org,
        lkp@...el.com
Subject: [fs] 54b35bdb5a: WARNING:possible_recursive_locking_detected

Greeting,

FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-9):

commit: 54b35bdb5a110e86e605e25c071ee34431be06bb ("fs: honor LOOKUP_NONBLOCK for the last part of file open")
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git nonblock-path-lookup


in testcase: boot

on test machine: qemu-system-i386 -enable-kvm -cpu SandyBridge -smp 2 -m 8G

caused below changes (please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace):


+---------------------------------------------+------------+------------+
|                                             | cae472f634 | 54b35bdb5a |
+---------------------------------------------+------------+------------+
| boot_successes                              | 6          | 0          |
| boot_failures                               | 0          | 20         |
| WARNING:possible_recursive_locking_detected | 0          | 20         |
| BUG:kernel_hang_in_boot_stage               | 0          | 20         |
+---------------------------------------------+------------+------------+


If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
Reported-by: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com>


[    1.820362] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
[    1.821377] 5.10.0-rc7-00093-g54b35bdb5a11 #1 Not tainted
[    1.821606] --------------------------------------------
[    1.821606] swapper/1 is trying to acquire lock:
[    1.821606] 41e76e18 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key){++++}-{3:3}, at: walk_component+0xdd/0x160
[    1.821606] 
[    1.821606] but task is already holding lock:
[    1.821606] 41e76e18 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key){++++}-{3:3}, at: path_openat+0x206/0x940
[    1.821606] 
[    1.821606] other info that might help us debug this:
[    1.821606]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[    1.821606] 
[    1.821606]        CPU0
[    1.821606]        ----
[    1.821606]   lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key);
[    1.821606] 
[    1.821606]  *** DEADLOCK ***
[    1.821606] 
[    1.821606]  May be due to missing lock nesting notation
[    1.821606] 
[    1.821606] 1 lock held by swapper/1:
[    1.821606]  #0: 41e76e18 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key){++++}-{3:3}, at: path_openat+0x206/0x940
[    1.821606] 
[    1.821606] stack backtrace:
[    1.821606] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.10.0-rc7-00093-g54b35bdb5a11 #1
[    1.821606] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.12.0-1 04/01/2014
[    1.821606] Call Trace:
[    1.821606]  ? dump_stack+0x1b/0x1d
[    1.821606]  ? validate_chain.cold+0x12a/0x135
[    1.821606]  ? __lock_acquire+0x48d/0x980
[    1.821606]  ? lock_acquire+0x97/0x280
[    1.821606]  ? walk_component+0xdd/0x160
[    1.821606]  ? down_read+0x32/0x100
[    1.821606]  ? walk_component+0xdd/0x160
[    1.821606]  ? path_lookupat+0x56/0x120
[    1.821606]  ? filename_lookup+0x6e/0x100
[    1.821606]  ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x1b/0x40
[    1.821606]  ? kern_path+0x1f/0x40
[    1.821606]  ? init_stat+0x20/0x51
[    1.821606]  ? clean_path+0x1c/0x4e
[    1.821606]  ? simple_strtoull+0x22/0x40
[    1.821606]  ? simple_strtoul+0x8/0x20
[    1.821606]  ? do_header+0x86/0x1f4
[    1.821606]  ? do_symlink+0x27/0x88
[    1.821606]  ? write_buffer+0x1f/0x2e
[    1.821606]  ? flush_buffer+0x21/0x6f
[    1.821606]  ? __gunzip+0x20f/0x299
[    1.821606]  ? decompress_method+0x66/0x66
[    1.821606]  ? __gunzip+0x299/0x299
[    1.821606]  ? gunzip+0x16/0x18
[    1.821606]  ? write_buffer+0x2e/0x2e
[    1.821606]  ? initrd_load+0x38/0x38
[    1.821606]  ? unpack_to_rootfs+0x166/0x26b
[    1.821606]  ? write_buffer+0x2e/0x2e
[    1.821606]  ? initrd_load+0x38/0x38
[    1.821606]  ? do_copy+0xca/0xca
[    1.821606]  ? populate_rootfs+0x47/0x93
[    1.821606]  ? do_one_initcall+0x54/0x200
[    1.821606]  ? parse_args+0xe0/0x300
[    1.821606]  ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x1b/0x40
[    1.821606]  ? trace_initcall_level+0x4d/0x74
[    1.821606]  ? kernel_init_freeable+0x112/0x181
[    1.821606]  ? kernel_init_freeable+0x137/0x181
[    1.821606]  ? rest_init+0xfb/0xfb
[    1.821606]  ? kernel_init+0x8/0xe5
[    1.821606]  ? ret_from_fork+0x1c/0x28
BUG: kernel hang in boot stage


To reproduce:

        # build kernel
	cd linux
	cp config-5.10.0-rc7-00093-g54b35bdb5a11 .config
	make HOSTCC=gcc-9 CC=gcc-9 ARCH=i386 olddefconfig prepare modules_prepare bzImage

        git clone https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests.git
        cd lkp-tests
        bin/lkp qemu -k <bzImage> job-script # job-script is attached in this email



Thanks,
Rong Chen


View attachment "config-5.10.0-rc7-00093-g54b35bdb5a11" of type "text/plain" (110503 bytes)

View attachment "job-script" of type "text/plain" (4690 bytes)

Download attachment "dmesg.xz" of type "application/x-xz" (8308 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ