lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201214145424.GH67148@shao2-debian>
Date:   Mon, 14 Dec 2020 22:54:24 +0800
From:   kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com>
To:     Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Cc:     0day robot <lkp@...el.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        lkp@...ts.01.org, ying.huang@...el.com, feng.tang@...el.com,
        zhengjun.xing@...el.com, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [cpuidle] cbf796d1ec: will-it-scale.per_thread_ops 30.5% improvement

Greeting,

FYI, we noticed a 30.5% improvement of will-it-scale.per_thread_ops due to commit:


commit: cbf796d1ecc513eda62f9edc1b6ab94c97eca63f ("[PATCH] cpuidle: Select polling interval based on a c-state with a longer target residency")
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Mel-Gorman/cpuidle-Select-polling-interval-based-on-a-c-state-with-a-longer-target-residency/20201130-172502
base: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git linux-next

in testcase: will-it-scale
on test machine: 192 threads Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 9242 CPU @ 2.30GHz with 192G memory
with following parameters:

	nr_task: 50%
	mode: thread
	test: context_switch1
	cpufreq_governor: performance
	ucode: 0x5003003

test-description: Will It Scale takes a testcase and runs it from 1 through to n parallel copies to see if the testcase will scale. It builds both a process and threads based test in order to see any differences between the two.
test-url: https://github.com/antonblanchard/will-it-scale





Details are as below:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->


To reproduce:

        git clone https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests.git
        cd lkp-tests
        bin/lkp install job.yaml  # job file is attached in this email
        bin/lkp run     job.yaml

=========================================================================================
compiler/cpufreq_governor/kconfig/mode/nr_task/rootfs/tbox_group/test/testcase/ucode:
  gcc-9/performance/x86_64-rhel-8.3/thread/50%/debian-10.4-x86_64-20200603.cgz/lkp-csl-2ap2/context_switch1/will-it-scale/0x5003003

commit: 
  735f7fba25 ("Merge branch 'pm-acpi' into linux-next")
  cbf796d1ec ("cpuidle: Select polling interval based on a c-state with a longer target residency")

735f7fba25ec002e cbf796d1ecc513eda62f9edc1b6 
---------------- --------------------------- 
         %stddev     %change         %stddev
             \          |                \  
   6268314           +30.5%    8182561 ±  4%  will-it-scale.96.threads
     42.44           -63.6%      15.46 ±  2%  will-it-scale.96.threads_idle
     65294           +30.5%      85234 ±  4%  will-it-scale.per_thread_ops
   6268314           +30.5%    8182561 ±  4%  will-it-scale.workload
     38966           -12.4%      34116        uptime.idle
     42.54           -26.8       15.75 ±  2%  mpstat.cpu.all.idle%
      1.18            +0.2        1.36 ±  2%  mpstat.cpu.all.irq%
      0.19            +0.0        0.21 ±  2%  mpstat.cpu.all.soft%
     53.08 ±  5%     +26.1       79.16 ±  2%  mpstat.cpu.all.sys%
     42.50 ±  2%     -62.9%      15.75 ±  2%  vmstat.cpu.id
     53.75 ±  5%     +48.4%      79.75 ±  2%  vmstat.cpu.sy
  12163039           +31.3%   15966074 ±  4%  vmstat.system.cs
    665714 ± 12%     -22.5%     516243 ±  4%  vmstat.system.in
  9.71e+09 ±  7%     -90.0%  9.714e+08 ± 47%  cpuidle.C1.time
 1.169e+09 ±  6%     -83.7%  1.908e+08 ± 44%  cpuidle.C1.usage
 4.601e+08 ± 20%     -57.7%  1.948e+08 ± 46%  cpuidle.C1E.time
  46905749 ±  9%     -98.7%     594464 ± 21%  cpuidle.C1E.usage
 6.118e+08 ±  6%    +242.9%  2.098e+09 ±  9%  cpuidle.POLL.time
 1.999e+08 ±  3%    +975.6%   2.15e+09        cpuidle.POLL.usage
    210053 ± 93%     -63.0%      77665 ±  7%  numa-vmstat.node0.nr_file_pages
     80079            -7.3%      74220 ±  5%  numa-vmstat.node0.nr_unevictable
     80079            -7.3%      74220 ±  5%  numa-vmstat.node0.nr_zone_unevictable
     72554          +459.1%     405683 ±126%  numa-vmstat.node1.nr_file_pages
      6490 ± 12%     +40.5%       9116 ± 13%  numa-vmstat.node1.nr_slab_reclaimable
    599080 ±  5%     +67.8%    1005136 ± 43%  numa-vmstat.node1.numa_hit
    437204 ±  4%     +88.8%     825383 ± 52%  numa-vmstat.node1.numa_local
    840279 ± 93%     -63.0%     310656 ±  7%  numa-meminfo.node0.FilePages
    320318            -7.3%     296882 ±  5%  numa-meminfo.node0.Unevictable
    252095 ± 28%     +38.5%     349273 ± 11%  numa-meminfo.node1.AnonPages.max
    290221          +458.6%    1621178 ±126%  numa-meminfo.node1.FilePages
     25964 ± 12%     +40.4%      36462 ± 13%  numa-meminfo.node1.KReclaimable
    947127 ±  7%    +140.0%    2273107 ± 91%  numa-meminfo.node1.MemUsed
     25964 ± 12%     +40.4%      36462 ± 13%  numa-meminfo.node1.SReclaimable
     91201 ±  5%     +22.2%     111421 ±  6%  numa-meminfo.node1.Slab
    889731 ± 15%     -59.8%     357286 ± 13%  sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.MIN_vruntime.avg
   2385001 ±  6%     -34.2%    1568402 ±  5%  sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.MIN_vruntime.stddev
      8006 ±  5%     +21.4%       9720 ±  5%  sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.load.avg
    889731 ± 15%     -59.8%     357286 ± 13%  sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.max_vruntime.avg
   2385001 ±  6%     -34.2%    1568402 ±  5%  sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.max_vruntime.stddev
      0.64           +14.6%       0.73        sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.nr_running.avg
      0.40           -18.0%       0.32 ±  4%  sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.nr_running.stddev
    270.21 ±  9%     +22.4%     330.75 ± 10%  sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.runnable_avg.min
    186.08 ±  3%      -9.7%     168.11 ±  6%  sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.util_est_enqueued.stddev
      6722 ±  8%     -18.0%       5514 ±  4%  sched_debug.cpu.avg_idle.min
      1491 ±  4%     +15.5%       1722 ±  4%  sched_debug.cpu.curr->pid.avg
      0.00 ± 15%     +21.8%       0.00 ±  6%  sched_debug.cpu.next_balance.stddev
   9512196           +31.3%   12485629 ±  4%  sched_debug.cpu.nr_switches.avg
   6727777           +14.2%    7683838 ± 12%  sched_debug.cpu.nr_switches.min
   1471055 ±  4%     +29.0%    1897520 ± 14%  sched_debug.cpu.nr_switches.stddev
     22.37 ±  2%      -3.2       19.15 ±  2%  perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.secondary_startup_64_no_verify
     22.25 ±  2%      -3.2       19.04        perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.start_secondary.secondary_startup_64_no_verify
     22.23 ±  2%      -3.2       19.02 ±  2%  perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.cpu_startup_entry.start_secondary.secondary_startup_64_no_verify
     22.16 ±  2%      -3.2       18.97 ±  2%  perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.do_idle.cpu_startup_entry.start_secondary.secondary_startup_64_no_verify
      7.11            -0.5        6.63        perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.schedule_idle.do_idle.cpu_startup_entry.start_secondary.secondary_startup_64_no_verify
      7.04            -0.5        6.58        perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__schedule.schedule_idle.do_idle.cpu_startup_entry.start_secondary
     24.05 ±  5%      +1.4       25.46        perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.finish_task_switch.__schedule.schedule.pipe_read.new_sync_read
     64.26            +3.2       67.46        perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__libc_read
     63.39            +3.2       66.61        perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.__libc_read
     61.02 ±  3%      +3.4       64.42        perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.pipe_read.new_sync_read.vfs_read.ksys_read.do_syscall_64
     61.27 ±  3%      +3.4       64.68        perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.new_sync_read.vfs_read.ksys_read.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe
     62.05 ±  3%      +3.4       65.49 ±  2%  perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.ksys_read.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.__libc_read
     61.73 ±  3%      +3.4       65.17        perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.vfs_read.ksys_read.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.__libc_read
     62.15 ±  3%      +3.4       65.59 ±  2%  perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.__libc_read
     22.34 ±  2%      -3.2       19.12 ±  2%  perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.do_idle
     22.37 ±  2%      -3.2       19.15 ±  2%  perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.secondary_startup_64_no_verify
     22.37 ±  2%      -3.2       19.15 ±  2%  perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.cpu_startup_entry
     22.25 ±  2%      -3.2       19.04        perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.start_secondary
      7.15            -0.5        6.68        perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.schedule_idle
      0.44 ± 34%      -0.2        0.22 ± 37%  perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.switch_mm_irqs_off
      0.53 ±  3%      -0.2        0.35 ±  6%  perf-profile.children.cycles-pp._raw_spin_lock
      0.20 ±  9%      -0.1        0.08        perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.call_cpuidle
      0.21 ± 10%      +0.0        0.24 ±  9%  perf-profile.children.cycles-pp._raw_spin_lock_irq
      0.03 ±100%      +0.0        0.07 ±  7%  perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.enter_lazy_tlb
      0.00            +0.1        0.06 ±  7%  perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.tick_nohz_tick_stopped
      0.00            +0.1        0.06 ±  6%  perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.menu_reflect
     64.32            +3.2       67.52        perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__libc_read
     75.42            +3.3       78.67        perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe
     61.28 ±  3%      +3.4       64.69        perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.new_sync_read
     61.03 ±  3%      +3.4       64.44        perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.pipe_read
     61.75 ±  3%      +3.4       65.19        perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.vfs_read
     62.07 ±  3%      +3.4       65.52 ±  2%  perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.ksys_read
      1.18 ± 22%      -0.7        0.50 ± 29%  perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.menu_select
      0.89 ±  3%      -0.3        0.55 ±  4%  perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.do_idle
      0.34 ±  4%      -0.3        0.07 ± 10%  perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.cpuidle_enter_state
      0.43 ± 36%      -0.2        0.22 ± 37%  perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.switch_mm_irqs_off
      0.53 ±  3%      -0.2        0.34 ±  6%  perf-profile.self.cycles-pp._raw_spin_lock
      0.19 ±  9%      -0.1        0.08 ±  5%  perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.call_cpuidle
      0.15 ±  5%      -0.0        0.12 ±  4%  perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.set_next_entity
      0.13            -0.0        0.12 ±  3%  perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.get_callchain_entry
      0.11 ±  4%      +0.0        0.13 ±  3%  perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.perf_callchain
      0.00            +0.1        0.05        perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.tick_nohz_tick_stopped
     24.19 ±  5%      +1.4       25.64        perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.finish_task_switch
     19.85 ±  3%      +2.0       21.84        perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.__schedule
      5.82 ±  5%     -59.2%       2.37 ± 25%  perf-stat.i.MPKI
  1.48e+10           +29.5%  1.917e+10 ±  4%  perf-stat.i.branch-instructions
      1.40            -0.1        1.26        perf-stat.i.branch-miss-rate%
 1.961e+08           +18.8%  2.329e+08 ±  3%  perf-stat.i.branch-misses
     35.09 ±  5%      -8.2       26.94 ±  3%  perf-stat.i.cache-miss-rate%
 1.322e+08 ±  2%     -57.1%   56633674 ± 29%  perf-stat.i.cache-misses
  3.79e+08 ±  5%     -44.8%  2.091e+08 ± 27%  perf-stat.i.cache-references
  12247195           +31.2%   16065718 ±  4%  perf-stat.i.context-switches
      8.40           -19.6%       6.75 ±  4%  perf-stat.i.cpi
 5.503e+11            +6.5%  5.859e+11        perf-stat.i.cpu-cycles
      4174 ±  2%    +192.9%      12225 ± 46%  perf-stat.i.cycles-between-cache-misses
 1.994e+10           +29.5%  2.583e+10 ±  4%  perf-stat.i.dTLB-loads
      0.00 ± 20%      -0.0        0.00 ± 11%  perf-stat.i.dTLB-store-miss-rate%
 1.231e+10           +29.4%  1.593e+10 ±  4%  perf-stat.i.dTLB-stores
     64.77 ±  2%     +29.3       94.10 ±  2%  perf-stat.i.iTLB-load-miss-rate%
 1.206e+08           +13.0%  1.363e+08        perf-stat.i.iTLB-load-misses
  64413270 ±  4%     -86.4%    8763560 ± 41%  perf-stat.i.iTLB-loads
 7.016e+10           +28.8%  9.036e+10 ±  4%  perf-stat.i.instructions
    569.25           +15.6%     657.82 ±  4%  perf-stat.i.instructions-per-iTLB-miss
      0.13           +21.3%       0.16 ±  4%  perf-stat.i.ipc
      2.87            +6.5%       3.05        perf-stat.i.metric.GHz
      0.65 ±  7%     +36.3%       0.88 ± 11%  perf-stat.i.metric.K/sec
    247.52           +28.7%     318.55 ±  4%  perf-stat.i.metric.M/sec
     84.55 ±  2%     -11.2       73.31 ±  6%  perf-stat.i.node-load-miss-rate%
  15049889 ±  4%     -74.8%    3789080 ± 14%  perf-stat.i.node-load-misses
   2940290 ± 11%     -35.2%    1904938 ± 16%  perf-stat.i.node-loads
   2982343 ±  3%     -18.5%    2429789 ±  2%  perf-stat.i.node-store-misses
      5.40 ±  5%     -57.6%       2.29 ± 25%  perf-stat.overall.MPKI
      1.33            -0.1        1.22        perf-stat.overall.branch-miss-rate%
     34.96 ±  5%      -8.1       26.84 ±  3%  perf-stat.overall.cache-miss-rate%
      7.84           -17.2%       6.50 ±  4%  perf-stat.overall.cpi
      4165 ±  2%    +186.5%      11932 ± 44%  perf-stat.overall.cycles-between-cache-misses
      0.00 ± 21%      -0.0        0.00 ± 13%  perf-stat.overall.dTLB-store-miss-rate%
     65.20 ±  2%     +28.8       94.03 ±  2%  perf-stat.overall.iTLB-load-miss-rate%
    581.69           +14.0%     663.02 ±  4%  perf-stat.overall.instructions-per-iTLB-miss
      0.13           +21.0%       0.15 ±  4%  perf-stat.overall.ipc
     83.38 ±  2%     -17.4       65.99 ±  7%  perf-stat.overall.node-load-miss-rate%
     92.24            -2.1       90.10        perf-stat.overall.node-store-miss-rate%
   3371185            -1.4%    3325203        perf-stat.overall.path-length
 1.475e+10           +29.5%   1.91e+10 ±  4%  perf-stat.ps.branch-instructions
 1.955e+08           +18.8%  2.321e+08 ±  3%  perf-stat.ps.branch-misses
 1.317e+08 ±  2%     -57.2%   56450230 ± 29%  perf-stat.ps.cache-misses
 3.777e+08 ±  4%     -44.8%  2.084e+08 ± 27%  perf-stat.ps.cache-references
  12212099           +31.2%   16017382 ±  4%  perf-stat.ps.context-switches
 5.484e+11            +6.5%  5.839e+11        perf-stat.ps.cpu-cycles
 1.987e+10           +29.5%  2.574e+10 ±  4%  perf-stat.ps.dTLB-loads
 1.227e+10           +29.4%  1.588e+10 ±  4%  perf-stat.ps.dTLB-stores
 1.202e+08           +13.0%  1.358e+08        perf-stat.ps.iTLB-load-misses
  64209734 ±  4%     -86.4%    8702382 ± 41%  perf-stat.ps.iTLB-loads
 6.992e+10           +28.8%  9.005e+10 ±  4%  perf-stat.ps.instructions
  14991538 ±  4%     -74.8%    3772726 ± 14%  perf-stat.ps.node-load-misses
   2980561 ± 11%     -35.2%    1931230 ± 16%  perf-stat.ps.node-loads
   2971777 ±  3%     -18.5%    2420748 ±  2%  perf-stat.ps.node-store-misses
 2.113e+13           +28.8%  2.721e+13 ±  4%  perf-stat.total.instructions
  14242369           +43.6%   20453485 ± 14%  interrupts.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
    302789 ±  5%     -69.4%      92591 ± 28%  interrupts.CPU0.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
     55617 ± 36%     +75.8%      97752 ±  6%  interrupts.CPU1.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
    346587 ± 12%     -76.8%      80514 ± 26%  interrupts.CPU1.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
      1234 ±  5%     +13.1%       1395 ± 10%  interrupts.CPU1.TLB:TLB_shootdowns
    291446 ±  9%     -75.5%      71367 ± 35%  interrupts.CPU10.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    293054 ± 11%     -70.9%      85412 ± 36%  interrupts.CPU100.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    302095 ±  9%     -74.3%      77648 ± 31%  interrupts.CPU101.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
     80761 ± 22%    +119.3%     177135 ± 36%  interrupts.CPU102.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
    302899 ± 11%     -73.4%      80499 ± 29%  interrupts.CPU102.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    321029 ± 14%     -74.9%      80605 ± 24%  interrupts.CPU103.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    294191 ±  5%     -72.2%      81859 ± 35%  interrupts.CPU104.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
      1182 ±  2%     +16.0%       1371 ± 13%  interrupts.CPU104.TLB:TLB_shootdowns
    328496 ± 16%     -76.7%      76676 ± 33%  interrupts.CPU105.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
      1198 ±  5%     +20.8%       1447 ± 13%  interrupts.CPU105.TLB:TLB_shootdowns
    310206 ± 12%     -75.6%      75696 ± 41%  interrupts.CPU106.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
     69659 ± 31%    +127.6%     158562 ± 32%  interrupts.CPU107.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
    297447 ±  9%     -75.5%      72992 ± 24%  interrupts.CPU107.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
     80204 ± 23%    +112.8%     170711 ± 52%  interrupts.CPU108.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
    293953 ±  2%     -74.0%      76292 ± 28%  interrupts.CPU108.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    286520 ±  6%     -72.9%      77778 ± 27%  interrupts.CPU109.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    292495 ±  6%     -75.8%      70787 ± 16%  interrupts.CPU11.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
      1192 ±  4%     +16.1%       1384 ±  5%  interrupts.CPU11.TLB:TLB_shootdowns
    316195 ±  9%     -74.6%      80276 ± 25%  interrupts.CPU110.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    307631 ±  2%     -75.1%      76562 ± 33%  interrupts.CPU111.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    303570 ± 10%     -74.1%      78638 ± 34%  interrupts.CPU112.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
      1182 ±  3%     +17.7%       1391 ± 10%  interrupts.CPU112.TLB:TLB_shootdowns
    305603 ±  8%     -75.0%      76370 ± 30%  interrupts.CPU113.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    289523 ±  6%     -69.1%      89337 ± 32%  interrupts.CPU114.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
      1208 ±  3%     +15.5%       1396 ±  5%  interrupts.CPU114.TLB:TLB_shootdowns
    309604 ± 13%     -76.0%      74154 ± 27%  interrupts.CPU115.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    299343 ±  5%     -78.6%      63990 ± 39%  interrupts.CPU116.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    295124 ±  5%     -75.4%      72509 ± 23%  interrupts.CPU117.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    292868 ± 11%     -74.7%      74217 ± 31%  interrupts.CPU118.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
      1207 ±  5%     +17.1%       1413 ±  8%  interrupts.CPU118.TLB:TLB_shootdowns
    291698 ± 10%     -76.6%      68348 ± 37%  interrupts.CPU119.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    284449 ±  6%     -72.9%      77219 ± 31%  interrupts.CPU12.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    426763 ± 12%     -78.3%      92702 ± 24%  interrupts.CPU120.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
     72282 ±  8%     +62.6%     117552 ± 35%  interrupts.CPU121.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
    404249 ± 30%     -75.8%      97726 ± 23%  interrupts.CPU121.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    465642 ± 11%     -79.1%      97350 ± 26%  interrupts.CPU122.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
     73895 ±  9%     +66.7%     123156 ± 41%  interrupts.CPU123.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
    447473 ± 14%     -78.7%      95151 ± 25%  interrupts.CPU123.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
     70797 ±  9%    +100.8%     142151 ± 34%  interrupts.CPU124.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
    424882 ± 17%     -76.8%      98594 ± 24%  interrupts.CPU124.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
     69260 ±  7%     +53.7%     106437 ± 31%  interrupts.CPU125.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
    430007 ± 17%     -77.0%      98917 ± 26%  interrupts.CPU125.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
      1273 ± 10%     +18.5%       1509 ±  5%  interrupts.CPU125.TLB:TLB_shootdowns
    430819 ± 18%     -77.1%      98726 ± 25%  interrupts.CPU126.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
     70441 ±  6%     +45.1%     102213 ± 18%  interrupts.CPU127.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
    447079 ± 14%     -78.3%      97117 ± 25%  interrupts.CPU127.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    443699 ± 19%     -78.2%      96855 ± 27%  interrupts.CPU128.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    450371 ± 16%     -78.7%      95732 ± 26%  interrupts.CPU129.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    287545 ±  4%     -72.9%      77874 ± 29%  interrupts.CPU13.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    446910 ± 16%     -77.8%      99114 ± 25%  interrupts.CPU130.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    436225 ± 17%     -78.5%      93679 ± 24%  interrupts.CPU131.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    431802 ± 17%     -77.8%      95678 ± 28%  interrupts.CPU132.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
      1320 ±  2%      +6.9%       1411 ±  4%  interrupts.CPU132.TLB:TLB_shootdowns
    426688 ± 16%     -80.8%      81814 ± 27%  interrupts.CPU133.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
      1219 ±  9%     +16.5%       1419 ±  6%  interrupts.CPU133.TLB:TLB_shootdowns
    446752 ± 15%     -77.7%      99616 ± 24%  interrupts.CPU134.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    447387 ± 15%     -78.3%      96914 ± 28%  interrupts.CPU135.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    388539 ± 27%     -75.9%      93786 ± 25%  interrupts.CPU136.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    464159 ± 13%     -78.8%      98388 ± 25%  interrupts.CPU137.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    423807 ± 18%     -78.0%      93197 ± 22%  interrupts.CPU138.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    417009 ± 19%     -77.3%      94554 ± 23%  interrupts.CPU139.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
     53720 ± 31%     +74.1%      93529 ± 21%  interrupts.CPU14.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
    300282 ±  8%     -73.6%      79258 ± 25%  interrupts.CPU14.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    450064 ± 18%     -78.6%      96254 ± 27%  interrupts.CPU140.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    426995 ± 22%     -78.0%      93902 ± 26%  interrupts.CPU141.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    431008 ± 17%     -78.1%      94542 ± 25%  interrupts.CPU142.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    445734 ± 18%     -79.2%      92553 ± 24%  interrupts.CPU143.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
     53876 ± 38%     +67.3%      90124 ± 19%  interrupts.CPU144.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
    409317 ± 14%     -78.6%      87747 ± 28%  interrupts.CPU144.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    433123 ± 15%     -78.7%      92242 ± 30%  interrupts.CPU145.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    456326 ± 11%     -79.9%      91931 ± 27%  interrupts.CPU146.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    442312 ± 14%     -79.1%      92503 ± 32%  interrupts.CPU147.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    415012 ± 19%     -77.7%      92376 ± 31%  interrupts.CPU148.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    422908 ± 16%     -80.2%      83565 ± 39%  interrupts.CPU149.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
     43339 ± 12%    +206.5%     132847 ± 78%  interrupts.CPU15.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
    293317 ±  6%     -73.4%      78093 ± 29%  interrupts.CPU15.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    419165 ± 17%     -79.1%      87792 ± 31%  interrupts.CPU150.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
      1437 ±  4%      +7.6%       1545        interrupts.CPU150.TLB:TLB_shootdowns
    432113 ± 16%     -79.9%      86957 ± 31%  interrupts.CPU151.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    429800 ± 16%     -78.8%      90939 ± 30%  interrupts.CPU152.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    415126 ± 13%     -78.4%      89737 ± 30%  interrupts.CPU153.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    416866 ± 17%     -79.0%      87670 ± 27%  interrupts.CPU154.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
      8667           -37.6%       5405 ± 34%  interrupts.CPU155.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
      8667           -37.6%       5405 ± 34%  interrupts.CPU155.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
    406134 ± 10%     -77.8%      89977 ± 31%  interrupts.CPU155.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    427996 ± 14%     -79.0%      89981 ± 31%  interrupts.CPU156.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    448767 ± 11%     -79.6%      91589 ± 30%  interrupts.CPU157.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
      7581 ± 24%     -28.7%       5406 ± 34%  interrupts.CPU158.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
      7581 ± 24%     -28.7%       5406 ± 34%  interrupts.CPU158.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
    426701 ± 15%     -78.4%      92220 ± 29%  interrupts.CPU158.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    448041 ± 13%     -80.0%      89809 ± 30%  interrupts.CPU159.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    292186 ±  8%     -73.6%      77250 ± 30%  interrupts.CPU16.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    432242 ± 15%     -79.5%      88814 ± 30%  interrupts.CPU160.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
      7581 ± 24%     -28.7%       5405 ± 34%  interrupts.CPU161.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
      7581 ± 24%     -28.7%       5405 ± 34%  interrupts.CPU161.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
    433737 ±  6%     -77.8%      96495 ± 28%  interrupts.CPU161.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
      7580 ± 24%     -28.8%       5399 ± 34%  interrupts.CPU162.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
      7580 ± 24%     -28.8%       5399 ± 34%  interrupts.CPU162.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
    442406 ± 12%     -80.4%      86541 ± 31%  interrupts.CPU162.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
      8664           -37.6%       5406 ± 34%  interrupts.CPU163.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
      8664           -37.6%       5406 ± 34%  interrupts.CPU163.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
    437140 ± 16%     -80.5%      85376 ± 31%  interrupts.CPU163.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    429498 ± 16%     -79.8%      86663 ± 29%  interrupts.CPU164.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
      7582 ± 24%     -28.7%       5407 ± 34%  interrupts.CPU165.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
      7582 ± 24%     -28.7%       5407 ± 34%  interrupts.CPU165.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
    422953 ± 19%     -79.1%      88390 ± 31%  interrupts.CPU165.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    421246 ± 18%     -80.2%      83543 ± 29%  interrupts.CPU166.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    426488 ± 14%     -79.7%      86475 ± 30%  interrupts.CPU167.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    422097 ± 27%     -77.8%      93575 ± 33%  interrupts.CPU168.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    433138 ± 27%     -78.2%      94401 ± 34%  interrupts.CPU169.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
      1326 ± 10%     +17.4%       1557        interrupts.CPU169.TLB:TLB_shootdowns
     48616 ± 28%    +170.2%     131361 ± 48%  interrupts.CPU17.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
    301599 ± 12%     -75.3%      74400 ± 28%  interrupts.CPU17.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
     97083 ± 16%     +48.7%     144322 ± 17%  interrupts.CPU170.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
    454424 ± 27%     -78.7%      96832 ± 29%  interrupts.CPU170.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    454177 ± 27%     -78.7%      96719 ± 32%  interrupts.CPU171.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
     96189 ± 25%     +66.3%     159968 ± 41%  interrupts.CPU172.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
    424628 ± 31%     -77.2%      96653 ± 36%  interrupts.CPU172.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
     91916 ± 22%     +36.5%     125493 ± 25%  interrupts.CPU173.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
    438862 ± 29%     -78.1%      96221 ± 34%  interrupts.CPU173.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
      1457 ±  5%     +10.6%       1612        interrupts.CPU173.TLB:TLB_shootdowns
    429241 ± 30%     -78.0%      94328 ± 35%  interrupts.CPU174.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
     74039 ± 24%     +68.6%     124865 ± 16%  interrupts.CPU175.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
    436566 ± 29%     -78.2%      95099 ± 34%  interrupts.CPU175.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    433470 ± 35%     -78.2%      94667 ± 34%  interrupts.CPU176.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
      8597           -37.6%       5368 ± 34%  interrupts.CPU177.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
      8597           -37.6%       5368 ± 34%  interrupts.CPU177.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
    437521 ± 30%     -78.7%      93103 ± 31%  interrupts.CPU177.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
      1322 ±  4%     +16.9%       1546 ±  5%  interrupts.CPU177.TLB:TLB_shootdowns
    442221 ± 30%     -78.3%      95947 ± 33%  interrupts.CPU178.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    431234 ± 28%     -80.5%      84072 ± 40%  interrupts.CPU179.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    287927 ±  6%     -73.7%      75610 ± 41%  interrupts.CPU18.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
     77534 ± 20%     +51.0%     117099 ± 20%  interrupts.CPU180.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
    439810 ± 29%     -78.7%      93730 ± 37%  interrupts.CPU180.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
      8595           -37.6%       5359 ± 34%  interrupts.CPU181.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
      8595           -37.6%       5359 ± 34%  interrupts.CPU181.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
    439654 ± 29%     -78.4%      95034 ± 35%  interrupts.CPU181.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    440152 ± 29%     -77.7%      98266 ± 31%  interrupts.CPU182.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    454422 ± 27%     -78.2%      99217 ± 36%  interrupts.CPU183.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    442085 ± 30%     -78.1%      96642 ± 34%  interrupts.CPU184.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    499501 ± 23%     -80.7%      96592 ± 32%  interrupts.CPU185.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
     75331 ± 30%     +77.9%     134031 ± 18%  interrupts.CPU186.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
    423805 ± 29%     -77.9%      93720 ± 30%  interrupts.CPU186.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    443090 ± 29%     -78.4%      95695 ± 31%  interrupts.CPU187.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    441406 ± 31%     -78.8%      93758 ± 30%  interrupts.CPU188.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    446635 ± 26%     -79.5%      91358 ± 36%  interrupts.CPU189.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
     50456 ± 19%    +226.9%     164951 ± 32%  interrupts.CPU19.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
    295593 ±  7%     -74.5%      75486 ± 27%  interrupts.CPU19.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
      1244 ± 13%     +20.7%       1502 ±  3%  interrupts.CPU19.TLB:TLB_shootdowns
    110949 ± 13%     -20.6%      88047 ± 11%  interrupts.CPU190.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
    450082 ± 27%     -79.3%      92982 ± 36%  interrupts.CPU190.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    414940 ± 29%     -79.6%      84568 ± 32%  interrupts.CPU191.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    298900 ±  7%     -73.6%      78989 ± 25%  interrupts.CPU2.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    292363 ±  6%     -69.9%      87950 ± 44%  interrupts.CPU20.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
     67808 ± 16%     +88.7%     127981 ± 40%  interrupts.CPU21.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
    305532 ± 12%     -75.1%      76085 ± 32%  interrupts.CPU21.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    313055 ±  6%     -75.3%      77402 ± 38%  interrupts.CPU22.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
     59229 ± 23%    +156.4%     151856 ± 29%  interrupts.CPU23.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
    291403 ±  5%     -68.7%      91140 ± 28%  interrupts.CPU23.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    426881 ± 11%     -78.8%      90323 ± 24%  interrupts.CPU24.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    397690 ± 30%     -76.6%      93167 ± 23%  interrupts.CPU25.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    460334 ± 10%     -79.4%      95008 ± 26%  interrupts.CPU26.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    441253 ± 15%     -79.3%      91311 ± 23%  interrupts.CPU27.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
     65455 ± 11%     +54.9%     101376 ±  7%  interrupts.CPU28.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
    417818 ± 17%     -77.1%      95678 ± 22%  interrupts.CPU28.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
     64308 ± 12%     +53.6%      98765 ± 23%  interrupts.CPU29.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
    422879 ± 18%     -77.8%      93874 ± 25%  interrupts.CPU29.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    297578 ±  5%     -73.6%      78532 ± 30%  interrupts.CPU3.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
     67766 ±  9%     +39.0%      94168 ± 21%  interrupts.CPU30.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
    427591 ± 17%     -77.2%      97532 ± 23%  interrupts.CPU30.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    449867 ± 13%     -78.9%      94827 ± 24%  interrupts.CPU31.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    446707 ± 15%     -78.6%      95387 ± 26%  interrupts.CPU32.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    457011 ± 14%     -79.1%      95705 ± 24%  interrupts.CPU33.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    464459 ± 12%     -79.6%      94745 ± 25%  interrupts.CPU34.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    464861 ± 17%     -79.0%      97686 ± 26%  interrupts.CPU35.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
      1515 ±  3%      -9.0%       1379 ±  4%  interrupts.CPU35.TLB:TLB_shootdowns
    443668 ± 14%     -79.3%      91884 ± 26%  interrupts.CPU36.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    437142 ± 14%     -82.0%      78554 ± 30%  interrupts.CPU37.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    454741 ± 13%     -78.4%      98002 ± 25%  interrupts.CPU38.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    459361 ± 13%     -78.8%      97535 ± 26%  interrupts.CPU39.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    289710 ±  9%     -74.9%      72730 ± 23%  interrupts.CPU4.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
     69146 ±  7%     +46.8%     101538 ± 37%  interrupts.CPU40.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
    396311 ± 26%     -76.1%      94778 ± 24%  interrupts.CPU40.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    520412 ± 10%     -81.9%      94115 ± 21%  interrupts.CPU41.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    443130 ± 15%     -77.7%      98963 ± 24%  interrupts.CPU42.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
     70985 ±  8%     +59.4%     113175 ± 41%  interrupts.CPU43.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
    430093 ± 18%     -76.9%      99531 ± 23%  interrupts.CPU43.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    458852 ± 15%     -79.1%      95751 ± 23%  interrupts.CPU44.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    439588 ± 21%     -78.1%      96447 ± 25%  interrupts.CPU45.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    442251 ± 16%     -79.0%      93005 ± 25%  interrupts.CPU46.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
     70351 ± 10%     +67.1%     117538 ± 62%  interrupts.CPU47.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
    438020 ± 15%     -77.9%      96952 ± 24%  interrupts.CPU47.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    405904 ± 13%     -77.7%      90476 ± 30%  interrupts.CPU48.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
      1309 ±  9%     +12.4%       1472 ±  6%  interrupts.CPU48.TLB:TLB_shootdowns
    436165 ± 12%     -79.4%      90022 ± 32%  interrupts.CPU49.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
      1361 ±  3%     +17.4%       1597 ±  5%  interrupts.CPU49.TLB:TLB_shootdowns
    294079 ±  7%     -74.1%      76160 ± 31%  interrupts.CPU5.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    441589 ± 13%     -79.4%      90865 ± 32%  interrupts.CPU50.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    436874 ± 14%     -79.3%      90560 ± 31%  interrupts.CPU51.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    425886 ± 16%     -78.1%      93259 ± 31%  interrupts.CPU52.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    427065 ± 16%     -80.3%      84093 ± 39%  interrupts.CPU53.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
      1343 ±  2%     +16.8%       1568 ±  9%  interrupts.CPU53.TLB:TLB_shootdowns
    419887 ± 16%     -78.3%      90974 ± 30%  interrupts.CPU54.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    438238 ± 13%     -80.2%      86919 ± 31%  interrupts.CPU55.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
      1306 ±  7%     +17.8%       1538 ±  4%  interrupts.CPU55.TLB:TLB_shootdowns
    436143 ± 14%     -79.1%      91331 ± 30%  interrupts.CPU56.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    423144 ± 13%     -78.8%      89912 ± 30%  interrupts.CPU57.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    421604 ± 16%     -79.1%      88265 ± 29%  interrupts.CPU58.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    405204 ±  8%     -77.4%      91581 ± 31%  interrupts.CPU59.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    292390 ±  7%     -74.5%      74430 ± 24%  interrupts.CPU6.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
      1214 ± 13%     +23.0%       1493 ±  9%  interrupts.CPU6.TLB:TLB_shootdowns
    437740 ± 12%     -79.3%      90508 ± 31%  interrupts.CPU60.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    444129 ± 12%     -79.6%      90674 ± 30%  interrupts.CPU61.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    438702 ± 13%     -79.0%      92259 ± 30%  interrupts.CPU62.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
      1326 ±  5%     +15.7%       1533 ±  5%  interrupts.CPU62.TLB:TLB_shootdowns
    446542 ± 15%     -80.0%      89429 ± 30%  interrupts.CPU63.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    442572 ± 13%     -79.8%      89377 ± 30%  interrupts.CPU64.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    491385 ±  4%     -81.3%      91811 ± 33%  interrupts.CPU65.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    461588 ± 10%     -80.6%      89487 ± 32%  interrupts.CPU66.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    446212 ± 14%     -79.6%      90972 ± 28%  interrupts.CPU67.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    451152 ± 13%     -80.0%      90371 ± 30%  interrupts.CPU68.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    457455 ± 14%     -80.9%      87371 ± 30%  interrupts.CPU69.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    300269 ±  5%     -75.2%      74391 ± 28%  interrupts.CPU7.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
     73157 ±  9%    +112.6%     155559 ± 15%  interrupts.CPU70.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
    429810 ± 17%     -78.9%      90750 ± 26%  interrupts.CPU70.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    423885 ± 16%     -79.0%      89168 ± 31%  interrupts.CPU71.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    422295 ± 29%     -78.0%      93060 ± 32%  interrupts.CPU72.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    439823 ± 27%     -77.6%      98648 ± 35%  interrupts.CPU73.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    451018 ± 28%     -77.7%     100570 ± 32%  interrupts.CPU74.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    444973 ± 30%     -78.5%      95689 ± 33%  interrupts.CPU75.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    429691 ± 29%     -77.2%      97998 ± 34%  interrupts.CPU76.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    436434 ± 30%     -77.8%      97060 ± 33%  interrupts.CPU77.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    425321 ± 29%     -77.7%      94843 ± 33%  interrupts.CPU78.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    444738 ± 26%     -78.4%      96035 ± 33%  interrupts.CPU79.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
     54232 ± 46%     +62.9%      88361 ± 15%  interrupts.CPU8.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
    289140 ±  6%     -73.8%      75834 ± 28%  interrupts.CPU8.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
     73790 ± 13%     +31.8%      97257 ± 24%  interrupts.CPU80.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
    432660 ± 33%     -77.9%      95487 ± 32%  interrupts.CPU80.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
     56196 ± 30%    +134.3%     131649 ± 33%  interrupts.CPU81.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
    444353 ± 26%     -77.3%     100713 ± 33%  interrupts.CPU81.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    451835 ± 25%     -78.5%      97078 ± 31%  interrupts.CPU82.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
     57924 ± 29%    +132.1%     134432 ± 24%  interrupts.CPU83.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
    425957 ± 28%     -79.2%      88669 ± 39%  interrupts.CPU83.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
     74287 ± 10%     +56.7%     116433 ± 36%  interrupts.CPU84.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
    432271 ± 28%     -77.7%      96376 ± 32%  interrupts.CPU84.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    444355 ± 26%     -78.7%      94632 ± 32%  interrupts.CPU85.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    443541 ± 27%     -77.4%     100212 ± 32%  interrupts.CPU86.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
      1238 ±  2%     +19.5%       1479 ±  8%  interrupts.CPU86.TLB:TLB_shootdowns
     65359 ± 35%     +78.0%     116314 ± 37%  interrupts.CPU87.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
    444175 ± 29%     -77.8%      98773 ± 33%  interrupts.CPU87.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    437085 ± 27%     -77.4%      98973 ± 33%  interrupts.CPU88.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
     68923 ±  9%    +153.7%     174863 ± 64%  interrupts.CPU89.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
    460304 ± 25%     -77.8%     102182 ± 34%  interrupts.CPU89.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    304412 ±  8%     -74.5%      77762 ± 25%  interrupts.CPU9.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    431822 ± 29%     -77.6%      96903 ± 33%  interrupts.CPU90.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
     77516 ±  6%     +53.0%     118575 ± 19%  interrupts.CPU91.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
    436790 ± 29%     -77.5%      98461 ± 33%  interrupts.CPU91.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    444167 ± 27%     -78.3%      96238 ± 30%  interrupts.CPU92.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    437668 ± 29%     -75.5%     107342 ± 27%  interrupts.CPU93.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
     70434 ± 21%     +76.5%     124334 ± 22%  interrupts.CPU94.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
    442115 ± 27%     -79.0%      93001 ± 35%  interrupts.CPU94.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    413192 ± 28%     -79.1%      86505 ± 31%  interrupts.CPU95.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    285542 ±  7%     -73.3%      76367 ± 32%  interrupts.CPU96.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    310167 ± 14%     -72.2%      86170 ± 29%  interrupts.CPU97.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    301698 ±  9%     -73.1%      81189 ± 25%  interrupts.CPU98.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
    305695 ±  8%     -74.8%      76997 ± 32%  interrupts.CPU99.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
  77358291 ± 14%     -77.8%   17184522 ± 22%  interrupts.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts


                                                                                
                            will-it-scale.per_thread_ops                        
                                                                                
  90000 +-------------------------------------------------------------------+   
        |                                      O       O                    |   
  85000 |-+       O                          O   O   O   O                  |   
        |           O              O O   O                                  |   
        | O O                                                               |   
  80000 |-+   O O       O        O     O   O       O                        |   
        |             O                                                     |   
  75000 |-+                    O                                            |   
        |                  O O                                              |   
  70000 |-+                +                          .+.+..                |   
        |        .+.+.   .. +     .+.                +      +.              |   
        | +.+.+.+     +.+    +.+.+   +.+.           +         +.+. .+.+.    |   
  65000 |++                              +.+.+.+.+.+              +     +.+.|   
        |                                                                   |   
  60000 +-------------------------------------------------------------------+   
                                                                                
                                                                                
[*] bisect-good sample
[O] bisect-bad  sample



Disclaimer:
Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided
for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software
design or configuration may affect actual performance.


Thanks,
Rong Chen


View attachment "config-5.10.0-rc5-00078-gcbf796d1ecc5" of type "text/plain" (171098 bytes)

View attachment "job-script" of type "text/plain" (8077 bytes)

View attachment "job.yaml" of type "text/plain" (5223 bytes)

View attachment "reproduce" of type "text/plain" (346 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ