lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 14 Dec 2020 11:15:12 -0500
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Anatoly Pugachev <matorola@...il.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sparc kernel list <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [sparc64] ftrace: kernel startup-tests unaligned access

On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 18:59:02 +0300
Anatoly Pugachev <matorola@...il.com> wrote:

> Hello!
> 
> Enabled ftrace startup tests on a sparc64 test VM/LDOM:
> 
> $ diff -u <(gzip -dc ~/dmesg/config-5.10.0.gz) <(gzip -dc /proc/config.gz)
> --- /dev/fd/63  2020-12-14 16:19:38.239372599 +0300
> +++ /dev/fd/62  2020-12-14 16:19:38.235372433 +0300
> @@ -2842,7 +2842,10 @@
>  # CONFIG_TRACEPOINT_BENCHMARK is not set
>  # CONFIG_RING_BUFFER_BENCHMARK is not set
>  # CONFIG_TRACE_EVAL_MAP_FILE is not set
> -# CONFIG_FTRACE_STARTUP_TEST is not set
> +CONFIG_FTRACE_SELFTEST=y
> +CONFIG_FTRACE_STARTUP_TEST=y
> +CONFIG_EVENT_TRACE_STARTUP_TEST=y
> +# CONFIG_EVENT_TRACE_TEST_SYSCALLS is not set
>  # CONFIG_RING_BUFFER_STARTUP_TEST is not set
>  # CONFIG_PREEMPTIRQ_DELAY_TEST is not set
>  # CONFIG_KPROBE_EVENT_GEN_TEST is not set
> 
> 
> Got the following results with kernel boot logs:
> 
> Dec 14 13:48:15 kernel: clocksource: jiffies: mask: 0xffffffff
> max_cycles: 0xffffffff, max_idle_ns: 7645041785100000 ns
> Dec 14 13:48:15 kernel: futex hash table entries: 65536 (order: 9,
> 4194304 bytes, linear)
> Dec 14 13:48:15 kernel: Running postponed tracer tests:
> Dec 14 13:48:15 kernel: Testing tracer function:
> Dec 14 13:48:15 kernel: Kernel unaligned access at TPC[552a20]
> trace_function+0x40/0x140
> Dec 14 13:48:15 kernel: Kernel unaligned access at TPC[552a24]
> trace_function+0x44/0x140
> Dec 14 13:48:15 kernel: Kernel unaligned access at TPC[552a20]
> trace_function+0x40/0x140
> Dec 14 13:48:15 kernel: Kernel unaligned access at TPC[552a24]
> trace_function+0x44/0x140
> Dec 14 13:48:15 kernel: Kernel unaligned access at TPC[552a20]
> trace_function+0x40/0x140

Does sparc64 require 8 byte alignment for 8 byte words?

-- Steve

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ